Re: drivers without explicit MAINTAINERS entry - was: Re: [media-workshop] Tentative Agenda for the November workshop

[martin@neutronstar.dyndns.org]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:53:17AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> On Thursday 08 November 2012 15:18:38 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
[ snip ]
> > 
> > These are 'Maintained' by me:
> > 
> > i2c/aptina-pll.ko              = i2c/aptina-pll.c
> > i2c/mt9p031.ko                 = i2c/mt9p031.c
> > i2c/mt9t001.ko                 = i2c/mt9t001.c
> > i2c/mt9v032.ko                 = i2c/mt9v032.c
> > 
> > I can maintain the following driver if needed:
> > 
> > i2c/mt9m032.ko                 = i2c/mt9m032.c
> 
> Do you plan to send a MAINTAINERS patch for this driver (and thus maintain the 
> driver :-)), or should I maintain it ?

I sadly neigher have time nor hardware to maintain this driver at the moment so i would
be more than happy if you can maintain it.

Thanks,
 - Martin Hostettler


> 
> > I could also take over maintenance the following driver, but I don't have
> > access to a hardware platform that uses it:
> > 
> > i2c/mt9v011.ko                 = i2c/mt9v011.c
> > 
> > These are, as far as I know, co-maintained by Sakari and me :-)
> > 
> > i2c/adp1653.ko                 = i2c/adp1653.c
> > i2c/as3645a.ko                 = i2c/as3645a.c
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart
>