From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18870 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753920Ab2LKPOW (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:14:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:13:54 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Hans Verkuil , Prabhakar Lad , Sylwester Nawrocki , linux-media , Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: RFC: First draft of guidelines for submitting patches to linux-media Message-ID: <20121211131354.055bd4e9@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3191306.PADCPVeiLd@avalon> References: <201212101407.09338.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <20121211082930.5f851888@redhat.com> <201212111250.21158.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <3191306.PADCPVeiLd@avalon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:20:32 +0100 Laurent Pinchart escreveu: [snip] > > - not sure if this is possible: if a v2 patch series is posted, then > > automatically remove v1. This would require sanity checks: same subject, > > same author. > > There's a security issue here as it's easy to spoof a sender e-mail address, > but I don't think that we need to care about it. This can be easily detected: if the patch author didn't opt-out, he, and the others who signed the v1 patch will receive a notification when it gets any status change. Also, when the patch gets merged on my tree, the author will receive another email. So, a fake submission can easily be detected. Cheers, Mauro