From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35671 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751741Ab2LVQpx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:45:53 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:45:29 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Frank =?UTF-8?B?U2Now6RmZXI=?= Cc: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Patch update notification: 4 patches updated Message-ID: <20121222144529.2727c94f@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50D5C37A.1030303@googlemail.com> References: <20121221232803.27830.79186@www.linuxtv.org> <50D5C37A.1030303@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Sat, 22 Dec 2012 15:28:10 +0100 Frank Schäfer escreveu: > Am 22.12.2012 00:28, schrieb Patchwork: > > Hello, > > > > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork: > > > > * em28xx: msi Digivox ATSC board id [0db0:8810] > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15792/ > > was: New > > now: RFC > > > > * em28xx: msi Digivox ATSC board id [0db0:8810] > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15783/ > > was: New > > now: RFC > > > > * em28xx: msi Digivox ATSC board id [0db0:8810] > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15773/ > > was: New > > now: RFC > > > > * em28xx: msi Digivox ATSC board id [0db0:8810] > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15764/ > > was: New > > now: RFC > > All these patches are superseeded. They're just discussions, and proposed patches (AKA: RFC). So, they were tagged as such. I use superseded when a new version of a normal patch is in patchwork. RFC is used there for patches meant for someone to test and give a feedback. That's the case of those all 4 patches. In any case, the practical effect is that patches that aren't "New" or "Under review" don't appear on my quilt queue anymore. Regards, Mauro > > Regards, > Frank -- Cheers, Mauro