From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34717 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752912Ab2L2NDJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:03:09 -0500 Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:02:43 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Hans Verkuil , "media-workshop@linuxtv.org" , linux-media Subject: Re: [media-workshop] Barcelona Media Summit Report Message-ID: <20121229110243.2bc33fbc@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20121229105338.55b87473@redhat.com> References: <201211161358.54938.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <20121229100813.6057011b@redhat.com> <20121229105338.55b87473@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:53:38 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: ... > - Tuner ownership: how should the tuner ownership be handled? The proposal > I wrote for this was accepted, with the addition that the code to handle > tuner ownership should be shared between DVB and V4L2. > I have my name > and Hans de Goede's name next to this topic, but I've forgotten what we > were supposed to do :-) The above obviously is not right ;) As far as I remember, it should be, instead: Hans de Goede, with the help of Hans Verkuil, will be working on an RFC code to handle tuner ownership for radio and video. -- Cheers, Mauro