public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: "Frank Schäfer" <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Devin Heitmueller" <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] em28xx: fix bytesperline calculation in TRY_FMT
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:33:57 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130129163357.4525114e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201301291921.50844.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>

Em Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:21:50 +0100
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> escreveu:

> On Tue January 29 2013 18:51:46 Frank Schäfer wrote:
> > Am 29.01.2013 10:49, schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> > > This was part of my original em28xx patch series. That particular patch
> > > combined two things: this fix and the change where TRY_FMT would no
> > > longer return -EINVAL for unsupported pixelformats. The latter change was
> > > rejected (correctly), but we all forgot about the second part of the patch
> > > which fixed a real bug. I'm reposting just that fix.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > 	Hans
> > >
> > > The bytesperline calculation was incorrect: it used the old width instead
> > > of the provided width, and it miscalculated the bytesperline value for the
> > > depth == 12 case.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-video.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-video.c b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
> > > index 2eabf2a..070506d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
> > > @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ static int vidioc_try_fmt_vid_cap(struct file *file, void *priv,
> > >  	f->fmt.pix.width = width;
> > >  	f->fmt.pix.height = height;
> > >  	f->fmt.pix.pixelformat = fmt->fourcc;
> > > -	f->fmt.pix.bytesperline = (dev->width * fmt->depth + 7) >> 3;
> > > +	f->fmt.pix.bytesperline = width * ((fmt->depth + 7) >> 3);
> > >  	f->fmt.pix.sizeimage = f->fmt.pix.bytesperline * height;
> > >  	f->fmt.pix.colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SMPTE170M;
> > >  	if (dev->progressive)
> > 
> > Hmm... how are 12 bit pixels stored ? Are padding bits used so that 2
> > bytes per pixel are needed ?
> 
> It's a planar format where the luma plane is twice as big as the two chroma
> planes combined. So that gives an effective 'depth' of 12 bits per pixel.
> The bytesperline value should be that of the largest plane.
> 
> I now realize that that is still wrong in the calculation above. It should
> be this instead:
> 
> 	f->fmt.pix.bytesperline = width * (fmt->depth >> 3);
>   	f->fmt.pix.sizeimage = (width * height * fmt->depth) >> 3;

The original code adds a "+ 7" to be sure that it will truncate upper
before dividing by 8.

> 
> > I wonder if V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUV411P has ever been tested (libv4lconvert
> > doesn't support it)...
> > 
> > While we are at it, we should check and fix the other size calculations,
> > too.
> > For example, in em28xx-video.c we have in
> > 
> > vidioc_g_fmt_vid_cap():
> > f->fmt.pix.bytesperline = (dev->width * dev->format->depth + 7) >> 3;
> > 
> > queue_setup():
> > size = (dev->width * dev->height * dev->format->depth + 7) >> 3;
> > 
> > buffer_prepare():
> > size = (dev->width * dev->height * dev->format->depth + 7) >> 3;
> > 
> > em28xx_copy_video():
> > int bytesperline = dev->width << 1;
> 
> Hmm, I'll have to prepare a RFCv2.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	Hans
> 
> > 
> > and there are probably more places...
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Frank
> > 
> > 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 

Cheers,
Mauro

      reply	other threads:[~2013-01-29 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-29  9:49 [RFC PATCH] em28xx: fix bytesperline calculation in TRY_FMT Hans Verkuil
2013-01-29 13:52 ` Devin Heitmueller
2013-01-29 17:51 ` Frank Schäfer
2013-01-29 18:21   ` Hans Verkuil
2013-01-29 18:33     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130129163357.4525114e@redhat.com \
    --to=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=dheitmueller@kernellabs.com \
    --cc=fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox