From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger_lists@hispeed.ch>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: terratec h5 rev. 3?
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:17:42 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130208131742.32ab0750@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510668E3.8060603@hispeed.ch>
Em Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:02:43 +0100
Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger_lists@hispeed.ch> escreveu:
> From: Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger_lists@hispeed.ch>
> To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: terratec h5 rev. 3?
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:02:43 +0100
> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2
>
> Am 21.12.2012 06:38, schrieb linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've recently got a terratec h5 for dvb-c and thought it would be
> > supported but it looks like it's a newer revision not recognized by em28xx.
> > After using the new_id hack it gets recognized and using various htc
> > cards (notably h5 or cinergy htc stick, cards 79 and 82 respectively) it
> > seems to _nearly_ work but not quite (I was using h5 firmware for the
> > older version). Tuning, channel scan works however tv (or dvb radio)
> > does not, since it appears the error rate is going through the roof
> > (with some imagination it is possible to see some parts of the picture
> > sometimes and hear some audio pieces).
>
> Ok I have received a replacement now and I can confirm this stick in
> fact just works like the same as the older versions (I guess maybe the
> first one had bad solder point?). I can't judge signal sensitivity or
> anything like that (the snr values are rather humorous) but it's
> definitely good enough now with no reception issues. The IR receiver is
> another matter and I was unsuccesful in making it work for now (I guess
> noone got it working with the old versions neither as it lacks the ir
> entries).
> So could this card be added? I've added the trivial patch.
Could you please add your Signed-of-by: to the patch?
Thanks,
Mauro
>
> Roland
>
>
>
> [h5rev3.diff text/x-patch (549 bytes)]
--
Cheers,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-08 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-21 5:37 terratec h5 rev. 3? Roland Scheidegger
2012-12-22 21:25 ` Roland Scheidegger
2012-12-22 23:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-01-04 20:08 ` Philipp Dreimann
2013-01-28 12:02 ` Roland Scheidegger
2013-02-08 15:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2013-02-09 0:11 ` Roland Scheidegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130208131742.32ab0750@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rscheidegger_lists@hispeed.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).