From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60256 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946041Ab3BHPRu (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:17:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:17:42 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Roland Scheidegger Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: terratec h5 rev. 3? Message-ID: <20130208131742.32ab0750@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <510668E3.8060603@hispeed.ch> References: <50D3F5A8.5010903@hispeed.ch> <510668E3.8060603@hispeed.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:02:43 +0100 Roland Scheidegger escreveu: > From: Roland Scheidegger > To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: terratec h5 rev. 3? > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:02:43 +0100 > Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2 > > Am 21.12.2012 06:38, schrieb linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org: > > Hi, > > > > I've recently got a terratec h5 for dvb-c and thought it would be > > supported but it looks like it's a newer revision not recognized by em28xx. > > After using the new_id hack it gets recognized and using various htc > > cards (notably h5 or cinergy htc stick, cards 79 and 82 respectively) it > > seems to _nearly_ work but not quite (I was using h5 firmware for the > > older version). Tuning, channel scan works however tv (or dvb radio) > > does not, since it appears the error rate is going through the roof > > (with some imagination it is possible to see some parts of the picture > > sometimes and hear some audio pieces). > > Ok I have received a replacement now and I can confirm this stick in > fact just works like the same as the older versions (I guess maybe the > first one had bad solder point?). I can't judge signal sensitivity or > anything like that (the snr values are rather humorous) but it's > definitely good enough now with no reception issues. The IR receiver is > another matter and I was unsuccesful in making it work for now (I guess > noone got it working with the old versions neither as it lacks the ir > entries). > So could this card be added? I've added the trivial patch. Could you please add your Signed-of-by: to the patch? Thanks, Mauro > > Roland > > > > [h5rev3.diff text/x-patch (549 bytes)] -- Cheers, Mauro