From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35899 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754361Ab3DOQu1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:50:27 -0400
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:50:18 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Frank =?UTF-8?B?U2Now6RmZXI=?= <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patchwork and em28xx delegates
Message-ID: <20130415135018.3a867598@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <516C2DC8.8080203@googlemail.com>
References: <516C2DC8.8080203@googlemail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

Em Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:41:44 +0200
Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com> escreveu:

> I've just noticed that my 2 pending em28xx patches have got delegate
> assigned:
> 
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17834/
> => delegated to mkrufky
> 
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17928/     (Obsoleted)
> => delegated to hverkuil
> 
> Ist this a patchwork failure or is the new submaintainers workflow the
> reason ?

Sub-maintainers workflow. We expect that most patches will be applied via 
one of the sub-maintainers. That will likely improve Kernel's quality and
help to reduce the maintainers overload.

-- 

Cheers,
Mauro