From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36946 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752854Ab3FNNeM (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:34:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:34:04 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Hans de Goede Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , Guy Martin Subject: Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release Message-ID: <20130614103404.3dc2c4bf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51BAC2F6.40708@redhat.com> References: <51BAC2F6.40708@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:15:02 +0200 Hans de Goede escreveu: > Hi All, > > IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a new > stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases > and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the > same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems > stable). > > So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ? Fine for me. There are 5 patches floating at patchwork to improve the DVB-S support with different types of DiSEqC, but applying them would break library support for tvd. So, they won't be applied as-is, and Guy needs to take some other approach. As he is also planning to add support there for rotors, it looks ok to postpone such changes to a latter version. So, feel free to bump it to version 1.0. Regards, Mauro -- Cheers, Mauro