From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: "linux-media" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbtv: fix dependency
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:42:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130628094246.555bb203.mchehab@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306281318.44880.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Em Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:18:44 +0200
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> escreveu:
> On Fri June 28 2013 13:00:43 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:24:15 +0200
> > Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> escreveu:
> >
> > > This fixes a dependency problem as found by Randy Dunlap:
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/27/501
> > >
> > > Mauro, is there any reason for any V4L2 driver to depend on VIDEO_DEV instead of
> > > just VIDEO_V4L2?
> > >
> > > Some drivers depend on VIDEO_DEV, some on VIDEO_V4L2, some on both. It's all
> > > pretty chaotic.
> >
> > It should be noticed that, despite its name, this config is actually a
> > joint dependency of VIDEO_DEV and I2C that will compile drivers as module
> > if either I2C or VIDEO_DEV is a module:
> >
> > config VIDEO_V4L2
> > tristate
> > depends on (I2C || I2C=n) && VIDEO_DEV
> > default (I2C || I2C=n) && VIDEO_DEV
> >
> > So, a V4L2 device that doesn't have any I2C device doesn't need to depend
> > on VIDEO_V4L2. That includes, for example, reversed-engineered webcam
> > drivers where the sensor code is inside the driver and a few capture-only
> > device drivers.
>
> Yes, it does have to depend on it. That's exactly why usbtv is failing: like
> any other v4l2 driver usbtv needs the videodev.ko module. That is dependent
> on VIDEO_V4L2. What is happening here is that the dependency of usbtv on
> VIDEO_DEV allows it to be built as part of the kernel, but VIDEO_V4L2 is built
> as a module due to its I2C dependency with the result that usbtv can't link to
> the videodev functions.
>
> The way things are today I do not believe any v4l2 driver should depend on
> VIDEO_DEV, instead they should all depend on VIDEO_V4L2. That would make a
> lot more sense.
Hmm...
$ git grep -l i2c drivers/media/v4l2-core/
drivers/media/v4l2-core/tuner-core.c (not part of videodev.ko module)
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c (actually, there's just a comment there)
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-device.c
$ git grep CONFIG_I2C drivers/media/v4l2-core/
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c:#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c:#endif /* defined(CONFIG_I2C) */
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-device.c:#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
yes, there are some parts of videodev that are dependent on I2C.
That's basically why all V4L2 drivers should depend on VIDEO_V4L2.
That's said, before the addition of v4l2-async, it was safe to compile
the core without I2C, as the parts of the code that are I2C specific are
protected by a:
#if defined(CONFIG_I2C)
With its addition, I suspect that we'll still have Kbuild issues, if I2C
is disabled and a driver that doesn't depends on I2C is compiled.
So, 2 patches seem to be needed:
1) a patch that replaces all driver dependencies from CONFIG_DEV to
CONFIG_V4L2;
2) a patch that fixes the issues with v4l2-async.
With regards to the last one, I can see 3 ways to fix it:
1) don't add v4l2-async at videodev.ko if I2C is not selected;
2) protect the I2C specific parts of v4l2-async with
#if defined(CONFIG_I2C)
3) put v4l2-async on a separate module.
(or some combination of the above)
As only very few drivers use v4l2-async, as this is more focused to
fix troubles with OT, I think that the better would be to do (3) and
to add an specific Kconfig entry for it.
Regards,
Mauro.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-28 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-28 8:24 [PATCH] usbtv: fix dependency Hans Verkuil
2013-06-28 11:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-06-28 11:18 ` Hans Verkuil
2013-06-28 12:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2013-06-28 12:59 ` Hans Verkuil
2013-06-28 13:24 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-06-28 13:55 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-06-28 14:15 ` Hans Verkuil
2013-06-28 15:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-06-28 17:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-07-03 17:26 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130628094246.555bb203.mchehab@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox