Fwd: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated

Fwd: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

Bad move.

----- Forwarded message from Patchwork <patchwork@linuxtv.org> -----

Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:58:03 -0000
From: Patchwork <patchwork@linuxtv.org>
To: rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:58:09 +0100

Hello,

The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork:

 * linux-media: [31/51] DMA-API: media: omap3isp: use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent()
     - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/20178/
     - for: Linux Media kernel patches
    was: New
    now: Accepted

This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond.

-

Patches submitted to linux-media@vger.kernel.org have the following
possible states:

New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches);

Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically,
	      the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork
	      doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer.
	      If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the
	      MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML;

Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the
	    same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first
	    version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was
	    superseeded by a git pull request.

Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't
	   exist anymore.

Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch;

Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the
	  time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing
	  for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch.

RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the
     patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes:
	- patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches
	  via git pull requests;
	- patches with a very active community (typically from developers
	  working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are
	  needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be
	  happy with.

Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via 
	        the media-tree.git.

Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied
	  via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied
	  either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree;
	  some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems,
	  etc);

If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML.

-

This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at
patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit
your mail settings at:
  http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/

----- End forwarded message -----

Re: Fwd: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Russell,

On Tuesday 15 October 2013 17:06:57 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Bad move.

Wrong status indeed. I wasn't planning to apply the patch through my tree as 
it's part of a much larger series. Sorry for the noise.

> ----- Forwarded message from Patchwork <patchwork@linuxtv.org> -----
> 
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:58:03 -0000
> From: Patchwork <patchwork@linuxtv.org>
> To: rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk
> Subject: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated
> Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:58:09 +0100
> 
> Hello,
> 
> The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork:
> 
>  * linux-media: [31/51] DMA-API: media: omap3isp: use
> dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/20178/
>      - for: Linux Media kernel patches
>     was: New
>     now: Accepted
> 
> This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond.
> 
> -
> 
> Patches submitted to linux-media@vger.kernel.org have the following
> possible states:
> 
> New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches);
> 
> Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically,
> 	      the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork
> 	      doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer.
> 	      If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the
> 	      MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML;
> 
> Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the
> 	    same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first
> 	    version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was
> 	    superseeded by a git pull request.
> 
> Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't
> 	   exist anymore.
> 
> Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch;
> 
> Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the
> 	  time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing
> 	  for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch.
> 
> RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the
>      patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes:
> 	- patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches
> 	  via git pull requests;
> 	- patches with a very active community (typically from developers
> 	  working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are
> 	  needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be
> 	  happy with.
> 
> Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via
> 	        the media-tree.git.
> 
> Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied
> 	  via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied
> 	  either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree;
> 	  some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems,
> 	  etc);
> 
> If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML.
> 
> -
> 
> This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at
> patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit
> your mail settings at:
>   http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart