From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:41225 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759533Ab3JOQHG (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:07:06 -0400 Received: from n2100.arm.linux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:214:fdff:fe10:4f86]:37420) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VW79A-00085l-76 for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:07:00 +0100 Received: from linux by n2100.arm.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VW798-0005OW-7t for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:06:58 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:06:57 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Fwd: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated Message-ID: <20131015160657.GE25034@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Bad move. ----- Forwarded message from Patchwork ----- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:58:03 -0000 From: Patchwork To: rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:58:09 +0100 Hello, The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork: * linux-media: [31/51] DMA-API: media: omap3isp: use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/20178/ - for: Linux Media kernel patches was: New now: Accepted This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond. - Patches submitted to linux-media@vger.kernel.org have the following possible states: New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches); Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically, the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML; Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was superseeded by a git pull request. Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't exist anymore. Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch; Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch. RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes: - patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches via git pull requests; - patches with a very active community (typically from developers working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be happy with. Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via the media-tree.git. Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems, etc); If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML. - This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit your mail settings at: http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/ ----- End forwarded message -----