From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59706 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751064Ab3KSArU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:47:20 -0500
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:47:18 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Cc: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: staging: media: Use dev_err() instead of pr_err()
Message-ID: <20131119004718.GA1047@kroah.com>
References: <20131114110814.6b13f62b@samsung.com>
 <20131115062939.GC28137@kroah.com>
 <20131117100321.18ed7be8@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131117100321.18ed7be8@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:03:21AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:29:39 +0900
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> escreveu:
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:08:14AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure how this patch got applied upstream:
> > > 
> > > 	commit b6ea5ef80aa7fd6f4b18ff2e4174930e8772e812
> > > 	Author: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
> > > 	Date:   Sun Oct 20 22:58:28 2013 +0530
> > > 	
> > > 	    staging:media: Use dev_dbg() instead of pr_debug()
> > > 	    
> > > 	    Use dev_dbg() instead of pr_debug() in go7007-usb.c.
> > >     
> > > 	    Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
> > > 	    Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > > 	    Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > 
> > > But, from the custody chain, it seems it was not C/C to linux-media ML,
> > > doesn't have the driver maintainer's ack[1] and didn't went via my tree.
> > 
> > It came in through my tree as part of the OPW intern application
> > process.
> 
> Ah, OK.
> 
> I don't mind if you apply those directly, but what makes me a little
> worried is that at least the final version of the patchset should be
> c/c to driver/subsystem maintainers for their review and for them to 
> know that the patch will be merged via some other tree, as it might
> be causing conflicts with their trees.
> 
> > And yes, sorry, it's broken, I have some follow-on patches to fix this,
> > but you are right, it should just be reverted for now, very sorry about
> > that.
> 
> No problem.
> 
> > Do you want to do that, or should I?
> 
> I prefer if you could do it, as I'm still waiting the merge from my tree,
> and I don't want to cascade another pull request before the original
> pull requests get handled. In any case, they won't conflict with this,
> as I don't have any patch for this driver on my tree for 3.13.

Ok, I'll do this after 3.13-rc1 is out, sorry for the problems.

greg k-h