From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]:49032 "EHLO mail-we0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754866AbbBCHsu (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 02:48:50 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q59so43336445wes.10 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:48:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 08:50:11 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter To: Rob Clark Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Sumit Semwal , LKML , "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , DRI mailing list , Linaro MM SIG Mailman List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , Tomasz Stanislawski , Robin Murphy , Marek Szyprowski , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [RFCv3 2/2] dma-buf: add helpers for sharing attacher constraints with dma-parms Message-ID: <20150203075011.GG14009@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <20150129143908.GA26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150129154718.GB26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150129192610.GE26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150202165405.GX14009@phenom.ffwll.local> <20150202214616.GI8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 05:36:10PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: > well, I guess anyways when it comes to sharing buffers, it won't be > the vram placement of the bo that gets shared ;-) Actually that's pretty much what I'd like to be able to do for i915. Except that vram is just a specially protected chunk of main memory. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch