From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:34133 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751221AbbCPHny (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 03:43:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:43:12 +0900 From: Simon Horman To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski , Linux Media Mailing List , Josh Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/4] soc-camera: Skip v4l2 clock registration if host doesn't provide clk ops Message-ID: <20150316074306.GA18193@verge.net.au> References: <1425883176-29859-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <1425883176-29859-5-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <1634321.iE70ufz1gl@avalon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1634321.iE70ufz1gl@avalon> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 02:00:25AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Sunday 15 March 2015 18:56:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > If the soc-camera host doesn't provide clock start and stop operations > > > registering a v4l2 clock is pointless. Don't do it. > > > > This can introduce breakage only for camera-host drivers, that don't > > provide .clock_start() or .clock_stop(). After your other 3 patches from > > this patch set there will be one such driver in the tree - rcar_vin.c. I > > wouldn't mind this patch as long as we can have an ack from an rcar_vin.c > > maintainer. Since I don't see one in MAINTAINERS, who can ack this? Simon? > > I don't think we have an official maintainer. Maybe a Tested-by would be > enough in this case ? I am quite happy to act as the maintainer of last resort for Renesas IP blocks and to be listed in MAINTAINERS if that is helpful. With regards to testing, I am also happy to help there, though in this case I would appreciate some help with a test case.