From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:36500 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753893AbbFBC4K (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:56:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:56:04 +0900 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/35] DocBook: fix emphasis at the DVB documentation Message-ID: <20150602115604.54302981@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <6674a17160ba2f80a4537d4dc9e501149c308706.1432844837.git.mchehab@osg.samsung.com> References: <6674a17160ba2f80a4537d4dc9e501149c308706.1432844837.git.mchehab@osg.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 28 May 2015 18:49:07 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Currently, it is using 'role="tt"', but this is not defined at > the DocBook 4.5 spec. The net result is that no emphasis happens. > > So, replace them to bold emphasis. Nit: I suspect the intent of the "emphasis" here was to get the code in a monospace font, which "bold" is unlikely to do. Isn't there a role="code" or something useful like that to use? I'd have to go look. jon