From: Ismael Luceno <ismael@iodev.co.uk>
To: khalasa@piap.pl (Krzysztof Hałasa)
Cc: linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SOLO6x10: remove unneeded register locking and barriers.
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 18:53:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150614185347.5c12ccf0@pirotess> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3twuiwc3j.fsf@t19.piap.pl>
On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:42:24 +0200
khalasa@piap.pl (Krzysztof Hałasa) wrote:
> readl() and writel() are atomic, we don't need the spin lock.
> Also, flushing posted write buffer isn't required. Especially on
> read :-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@piap.pl>
>
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-core.c
> @@ -483,7 +483,6 @@ static int solo_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> solo_dev->type = id->driver_data;
> solo_dev->pdev = pdev;
> - spin_lock_init(&solo_dev->reg_io_lock);
> ret = v4l2_device_register(&pdev->dev, &solo_dev->v4l2_dev);
> if (ret)
> goto fail_probe;
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10.h
> @@ -201,7 +201,6 @@ struct solo_dev {
> int nr_ext;
> u32 irq_mask;
> u32 motion_mask;
> - spinlock_t reg_io_lock;
> struct v4l2_device v4l2_dev;
>
> /* tw28xx accounting */
> @@ -283,36 +282,13 @@ struct solo_dev {
>
> static inline u32 solo_reg_read(struct solo_dev *solo_dev, int reg)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> - u32 ret;
> - u16 val;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&solo_dev->reg_io_lock, flags);
> -
> - ret = readl(solo_dev->reg_base + reg);
> - rmb();
> - pci_read_config_word(solo_dev->pdev, PCI_STATUS, &val);
> - rmb();
> -
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&solo_dev->reg_io_lock, flags);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return readl(solo_dev->reg_base + reg);
> }
>
> static inline void solo_reg_write(struct solo_dev *solo_dev, int reg,
> u32 data)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> - u16 val;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&solo_dev->reg_io_lock, flags);
> -
> writel(data, solo_dev->reg_base + reg);
> - wmb();
> - pci_read_config_word(solo_dev->pdev, PCI_STATUS, &val);
> - rmb();
> -
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&solo_dev->reg_io_lock, flags);
> }
>
> static inline void solo_irq_on(struct solo_dev *dev, u32 mask)
Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <ismael@iodev.co.uk>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-14 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 13:30 A few SOLO6x10 patches Krzysztof Hałasa
2015-06-08 13:35 ` [PATCH] SOLO6x10: Fix G.723 minimum audio period count Krzysztof Hałasa
2015-06-14 21:51 ` Ismael Luceno
2015-06-08 13:37 ` [PATCH] SOLO6x10: unmap registers only after free_irq() Krzysztof Hałasa
2015-06-14 21:52 ` Ismael Luceno
2015-06-08 13:42 ` [PATCH] SOLO6x10: remove unneeded register locking and barriers Krzysztof Hałasa
2015-06-14 21:53 ` Ismael Luceno [this message]
2015-06-08 13:50 ` [PATCH] SOLO6x10: Remove dead code Krzysztof Hałasa
2015-06-14 21:53 ` Ismael Luceno
2015-06-14 21:50 ` A few SOLO6x10 patches Ismael Luceno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150614185347.5c12ccf0@pirotess \
--to=ismael@iodev.co.uk \
--cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox