From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:44892 "EHLO mout01.posteo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753250AbbKMJyg (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 04:54:36 -0500 Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DF0F20B40 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:54:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:54:31 +0100 From: Patrick Boettcher To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Alec Leamas , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Message-ID: <20151113105431.71030921@dibcom294.coe.adi.dibcom.com> In-Reply-To: <20151112154150.33a1979a@recife.lan> References: <5644AD42.4060904@users.sourceforge.net> <20151112152022.4f212b97@recife.lan> <5644CD07.6020303@gmail.com> <20151112154150.33a1979a@recife.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:41:50 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Is putting the patch in an attachment OK? > > No, because it doesn't make easy for people to reply with comments. Except if you are using claws. With which you can select text in a text attachment and click the reply button and it will create a response with the selected text in the message body. But only this part, not the rest of the message. regards, -- Patrick.