From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:50335 "EHLO mout01.posteo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1425501AbcBRNel convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:34:41 -0500 Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EBF320C00 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:34:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:34:31 +0100 From: Patrick Boettcher To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Hans Verkuil , Jani Nikula , Daniel Vetter , Jonathan Corbet , Keith Packard , LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Message-ID: <20160218143431.2e0a9150@lappi3.vsora> In-Reply-To: <20160218104434.25d11e33@recife.lan> References: <20160213145317.247c63c7@lwn.net> <86fuwwcdmd.fsf@hiro.keithp.com> <20160217151401.3cb82f65@lwn.net> <874md6fkna.fsf@intel.com> <20160218082657.5a1a5b0f@recife.lan> <87r3gadzye.fsf@intel.com> <20160218100427.6471cb22@recife.lan> <56C5B3E7.6030509@xs4all.nl> <20160218104434.25d11e33@recife.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:44:34 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > It is workable, but I guess nested tables produced a better > > > result. > > > > > > I did myself a test with nested tables with asciidoc too: > > > > > > https://mchehab.fedorapeople.org/media-kabi-docs-test/pandoc_asciidoc/table.html > > > https://mchehab.fedorapeople.org/media-kabi-docs-test/pandoc_asciidoc/table.ascii > > > > > > With looks very decent to me. > > > > It does, except for the vertical alignment of the third column (at > > least when viewed with google chrome). > > Not sure what you mean. Here, it looks fine on both Firefox and > Chrome, except that the second colum size could be smaller. If this > is what you're meaning this can be fixed by changing the second line > from: I think Hans' problem (I see it as well) is coming from css-style of "paragraph" which is:  margin-top: 0.5em;  margin-bottom: 0.5em; This makes the third column non-vertical-aligned -- Patrick