From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:45698 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751026AbcEDNgV (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2016 09:36:21 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E08F20A1F for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 09:36:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 16:34:08 +0300 From: Andrey Utkin To: Ismael Luceno Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil , chall@corp.bluecherry.net, maintainers@bluecherrydvr.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] solo6x10: Set FRAME_BUF_SIZE to 200KB Message-ID: <20160504133408.GA18570@acer> References: <1461986229-11949-1-git-send-email-ismael@iodev.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1461986229-11949-1-git-send-email-ismael@iodev.co.uk> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:17:08AM -0300, Ismael Luceno wrote: > Such frame size is met in practice. Also report oversized frames. > > Based on patches by Andrey Utkin . If it is based on my patches([1] [2]), then why you claim authorship and why you don't let me know (at last CCing me)? Do you know that 200 KiB is not the limit, just as previous value? I haven't researched subj deep enough to figure out proven good value for new buffer size. It's both laughable and infuriating for me to spectate your behaviour of "stealth driver developer". You have added yourself back to driver maintainers in MAINTAINERS file after your quit without letting us know. You are not affiliated with Bluecherry for two years, and you are not informed about how the driver is working in production on customers setups. So you are not aware what are real issues with it. BTW do you still have a sample of actual hardware? Yeah, I agree that this can be argument against Bluecherry and lack of openness in its bug tracking. But you are also not open and not collaborating. The point of my accusation to you is that you seem to be just gaining "kernel developer" score for nobody's (except your CV's) benefit. Development and maintenance is what Hans Verkuil, Krzysztof Halasa and others do to this driver, but not this. Sorry to be harsh. [1] https://github.com/bluecherrydvr/solo6x10/commit/5cd985087362e2e524b3e44504eea791ae7cda7e [2] https://github.com/bluecherrydvr/solo6x10/commit/3b437f79c40438eb09bb2d5dbcfe67dbc94648ed