From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
To: Abylay Ospan <aospan@netup.ru>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [dvbv5-scan] wait no more than timeout when scanning
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:18:51 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160722161851.034752e7@recife.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469210077-12313-1-git-send-email-aospan@netup.ru>
Hi Abylay,
Em Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:54:37 -0400
Abylay Ospan <aospan@netup.ru> escreveu:
> some frontends (mentioned on lgdt3306a) wait timeout inside code like:
> for (i = 20; i > 0; i--) {
> msleep(50);
>
> If there is no-LOCK then dvbv5-scan spent a lot of time (doing 40x calls).
> This patch introduce timeout which 4 sec * multiply. So we do not wait more
> than 4 sec (or so) if no-LOCK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abylay Ospan <aospan@netup.ru>
> ---
> utils/dvb/dvbv5-scan.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/utils/dvb/dvbv5-scan.c b/utils/dvb/dvbv5-scan.c
> index 689bc0b..1fc33d7 100644
> --- a/utils/dvb/dvbv5-scan.c
> +++ b/utils/dvb/dvbv5-scan.c
> @@ -182,12 +182,23 @@ static int print_frontend_stats(struct arguments *args,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* return timestamp in msec */
> +uint64_t get_timestamp()
> +{
> + struct timeval now;
> + gettimeofday(&now, 0);
> + return now.tv_sec * 1000 + now.tv_usec/1000;
This is not good, as gettimeofday() is not monotonic, and may be affected
by clock adjustments.
IMHO, the best would be to adjust the do_timeout() to handle
args->timeout_multiply.
Regards,
Mauro
> +}
> +
> static int check_frontend(void *__args,
> struct dvb_v5_fe_parms *parms)
> {
> struct arguments *args = __args;
> int rc, i;
> fe_status_t status;
> + uint64_t start = get_timestamp();
> + /* msec timeout by default 4 sec * multiply */
> + uint64_t timeout = args->timeout_multiply * 4 * 1000;
>
> args->n_status_lines = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < args->timeout_multiply * 40; i++) {
> @@ -203,6 +214,10 @@ static int check_frontend(void *__args,
> print_frontend_stats(args, parms);
> if (status & FE_HAS_LOCK)
> break;
> +
> + if ((get_timestamp() - start) > timeout)
> + break;
> +
> usleep(100000);
It would also make sense to remove the usleep here and
use something else that would be checking timeout_flag,
like:
for (i = 1; i < 100; i++) {
if (timeout_flag)
break;
usleep(1000);
}
--
Thanks,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-22 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-22 17:54 [PATCH] [dvbv5-scan] wait no more than timeout when scanning Abylay Ospan
2016-07-22 19:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2016-07-25 4:01 ` Abylay Ospan
2016-07-25 18:47 ` Abylay Ospan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-25 3:35 Abylay Ospan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160722161851.034752e7@recife.lan \
--to=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=aospan@netup.ru \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox