From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-buf: Do a fast lockless check for poll with timeout=0
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 19:04:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160828170435.GC10980@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160828163747.32751-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 05:37:47PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Currently we install a callback for performing poll on a dma-buf,
> irrespective of the timeout. This involves taking a spinlock, as well as
> unnecessary work, and greatly reduces scaling of poll(.timeout=0) across
> multiple threads.
>
> We can query whether the poll will block prior to installing the
> callback to make the busy-query fast.
>
> Single thread: 60% faster
> 8 threads on 4 (+4 HT) cores: 600% faster
>
> Still not quite the perfect scaling we get with a native busy ioctl, but
> poll(dmabuf) is faster due to the quicker lookup of the object and
> avoiding drm_ioctl().
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index cf04d249a6a4..c7a7bc579941 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,18 @@ static unsigned int dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
> if (!events)
> return 0;
>
> + if (poll_does_not_wait(poll)) {
> + if (events & POLLOUT &&
> + !reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(resv, true))
> + events &= ~(POLLOUT | POLLIN);
> +
> + if (events & POLLIN &&
> + !reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(resv, false))
> + events &= ~POLLIN;
> +
> + return events;
> + }
> +
> retry:
> seq = read_seqcount_begin(&resv->seq);
> rcu_read_lock();
> --
> 2.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-28 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-28 16:37 [PATCH] dma-buf: Do a fast lockless check for poll with timeout=0 Chris Wilson
2016-08-28 17:04 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2016-08-28 20:33 ` Chris Wilson
2016-08-28 20:50 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160828170435.GC10980@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox