From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:40930 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932163AbcJQSuc (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:50:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:50:25 +0100 From: Andrey Utkin To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Media Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Hans Verkuil , Geunyoung Kim , Inki Dae , Junghak Sung , Julia Lawall , Robert Jarzmik , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Wei Yongjun , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 54/57] [media] platform: don't break long lines Message-ID: <20161017195025.GC21569@stationary.pb.com> References: <3227277.L9jDJkdF0E@avalon> <20161017193945.GA21569@stationary.pb.com> <1555833.ll1z87MvFR@avalon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1555833.ll1z87MvFR@avalon> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:44:19PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Monday 17 Oct 2016 20:39:45 Andrey Utkin wrote: > > Maybe the remaining manual work may be outsourced to seekers of janitor > > tasks? > > I'm fine with that, but we should rework the original patches, not merge fixes > on top of them. I haven't meant that :) What I had in mind was a singular patchset with combination of automated and manual work, just as you say, I just didn't state it clearly.