From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ec2-52-27-115-49.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([52.27.115.49]:44716 "EHLO osg.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933567AbcKPPTj (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:19:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:19:32 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: LMML , linux-samsung-soc Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes for 4.8 Message-ID: <20161116131932.7c2908e3@vento.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <8001c83d-0e3a-61cb-bf53-8c2b497bd0ed@samsung.com> <20161021102607.2df96630@vento.lan> <70cc3f35-e661-c76f-8620-dfeb74030183@samsung.com> <20161116124600.66e4c9e4@vento.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:08:19 +0100 Sylwester Nawrocki escreveu: > On 11/16/2016 03:46 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>>> Marek Szyprowski (1): > >>>> > >> s5p-mfc: fix failure path of s5p_mfc_alloc_memdev() > >> > > >> > Mauro, this patch seems to had slipped through the cracks, I can't see it > >> > in neither media fixes nor the master branch. Could you please check it? > > > > The patch seems to be on my tree: > > Oops, sorry, I didn't check it properly. Would be nice to see that > patch also in linux-next. I'll likely add all patches at linux-next today, after handling more patches. Thanks, Mauro