From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ec2-52-27-115-49.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([52.27.115.49]:34285
        "EHLO osg.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751064AbcLHNAm (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 08:00:42 -0500
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:59:47 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: Felipe Sanches <juca@members.fsf.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL FOR v4.11] Remove FSF postal address
Message-ID: <20161208105947.3f4fa3aa@vento.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20161208110920.GG16630@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
References: <20161208080825.GB16630@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
        <CAK6XL6DaXaf=dxU20BpyVqW_UxaFOfTGtVO6MppvPuZxa9puMA@mail.gmail.com>
        <20161208110920.GG16630@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Sakari,

Em Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:09:20 +0200
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> escreveu:

> Hi Felipe,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:51:20AM -0200, Felipe Sanches wrote:
> > but why?  
> 
> Please see my reply here:
> 
> <URL:http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg107204.html>

Please don't. If people wanted that, they would be sending a big
massive change by the time FSF check was added to checkpatch.

This is the kind of patch that can rise conflicts with other
patches, and don't really benefit the code.

Ok, if you're doing massive changes on some driver, be my
guest and remove the FSF address from it. Otherwise, just live
it as-is.

Regards,
Mauro