public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: sakari.ailus@iki.fi, pali.rohar@gmail.com,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
	ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 06/13] v4l2-async: per notifier locking
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:07:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170214160720.xamqwoqo7rnb2nxi@earth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170214133956.GA8530@amd>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7507 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:39:56PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
> 
> Without this, camera support breaks boot on N900.

That's kind of vague. I just checked my original patch and it looks
like I did not bother to write a proper patch description. I suggest
to make this

"Fix v4l2-async locking, so that v4l2_async_notifiers can be used
recursively. This is important for sensors, that are only reachable
by the image signal processor through some intermediate device."

You should probably move move this patch directly before the
video-bus-switch patch, since its a preparation for it.

Also this is missing my SoB:

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>

> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  include/media/v4l2-async.h           |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> index 96cc733..26492a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ static bool match_custom(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
>  
>  static LIST_HEAD(subdev_list);
>  static LIST_HEAD(notifier_list);
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(list_lock);
>  
>  static struct v4l2_async_subdev *v4l2_async_belongs(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
>  						    struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> @@ -102,12 +101,15 @@ static int v4l2_async_test_notify(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
>  
>  	if (notifier->bound) {
>  		ret = notifier->bound(notifier, sd, asd);
> -		if (ret < 0)
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_warn(notifier->v4l2_dev->dev, "subdev bound failed\n");
>  			return ret;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(notifier->v4l2_dev, sd);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_warn(notifier->v4l2_dev->dev, "subdev register failed\n");
>  		if (notifier->unbind)
>  			notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, asd);
>  		return ret;
> @@ -141,7 +143,7 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
>  {
>  	struct v4l2_subdev *sd, *tmp;
>  	struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd;
> -	int i;
> +	int ret = 0, i;
>  
>  	if (!notifier->num_subdevs || notifier->num_subdevs > V4L2_MAX_SUBDEVS)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -149,6 +151,7 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
>  	notifier->v4l2_dev = v4l2_dev;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&notifier->waiting);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&notifier->done);
> +	mutex_init(&notifier->lock);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < notifier->num_subdevs; i++) {
>  		asd = notifier->subdevs[i];
> @@ -168,28 +171,22 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
>  		list_add_tail(&asd->list, &notifier->waiting);
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&list_lock);
> +	/* Keep also completed notifiers on the list */
> +	list_add(&notifier->list, &notifier_list);
> +	mutex_lock(&notifier->lock);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(sd, tmp, &subdev_list, async_list) {
> -		int ret;
> -
>  		asd = v4l2_async_belongs(notifier, sd);
>  		if (!asd)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		ret = v4l2_async_test_notify(notifier, sd, asd);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			break;
>  	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&notifier->lock);
>  
> -	/* Keep also completed notifiers on the list */
> -	list_add(&notifier->list, &notifier_list);
> -
> -	mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_async_notifier_register);
>  
> @@ -210,7 +207,7 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>  			"Failed to allocate device cache!\n");
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&list_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&notifier->lock);
>  
>  	list_del(&notifier->list);
>  
> @@ -237,7 +234,7 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>  			put_device(d);
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&notifier->lock);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Call device_attach() to reprobe devices
> @@ -262,6 +259,7 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>  	}
>  	kfree(dev);
>  
> +	mutex_destroy(&notifier->lock);
>  	notifier->v4l2_dev = NULL;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -274,6 +272,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_async_notifier_unregister);
>  int v4l2_async_register_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>  {
>  	struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier;
> +	struct v4l2_async_notifier *tmp;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * No reference taken. The reference is held by the device
> @@ -283,24 +282,25 @@ int v4l2_async_register_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>  	if (!sd->of_node && sd->dev)
>  		sd->of_node = sd->dev->of_node;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&list_lock);
> -
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sd->async_list);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(notifier, &notifier_list, list) {
> -		struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd = v4l2_async_belongs(notifier, sd);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(notifier, tmp, &notifier_list, list) {
> +		struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd;
> +
> +		/* TODO: FIXME: if this is called by ->bound() we will also iterate over the locked notifier */
> +		mutex_lock_nested(&notifier->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +		asd = v4l2_async_belongs(notifier, sd);
>  		if (asd) {
>  			int ret = v4l2_async_test_notify(notifier, sd, asd);
> -			mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> +			mutex_unlock(&notifier->lock);
>  			return ret;
>  		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&notifier->lock);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* None matched, wait for hot-plugging */
>  	list_add(&sd->async_list, &subdev_list);
>  
> -	mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_async_register_subdev);
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ void v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&list_lock);
> +	mutex_lock_nested(&notifier->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>  
>  	list_add(&sd->asd->list, &notifier->waiting);
>  
> @@ -324,6 +324,6 @@ void v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>  	if (notifier->unbind)
>  		notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, sd->asd);
>  
> -	mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&notifier->lock);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_async_unregister_subdev);
> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-async.h b/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> index 8e2a236..690a81f 100644
> --- a/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct v4l2_async_subdev {
>   * @waiting:	list of struct v4l2_async_subdev, waiting for their drivers
>   * @done:	list of struct v4l2_subdev, already probed
>   * @list:	member in a global list of notifiers
> + * @lock:       lock hold when the notifier is being processed
>   * @bound:	a subdevice driver has successfully probed one of subdevices
>   * @complete:	all subdevices have been probed successfully
>   * @unbind:	a subdevice is leaving
> @@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ struct v4l2_async_notifier {
>  	struct list_head waiting;
>  	struct list_head done;
>  	struct list_head list;
> +	struct mutex lock;
>  	int (*bound)(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
>  		     struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
>  		     struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd);
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> 
> -- 
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html



[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-14 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-14 13:39 [RFC 06/13] v4l2-async: per notifier locking Pavel Machek
2017-02-14 16:07 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
2017-02-15 10:58   ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-14 21:57 ` Sakari Ailus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170214160720.xamqwoqo7rnb2nxi@earth \
    --to=sre@kernel.org \
    --cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox