From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:54816 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1952059AbdEAIcz (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2017 04:32:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 10:32:48 +0200 From: Simon Horman To: kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com Cc: Kieran Bingham , laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se, sakari.ailus@iki.fi, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: ADV748x HDMI/Analog video receiver Message-ID: <20170501083248.GG18349@verge.net.au> References: <1493317564-18026-1-git-send-email-kbingham@kernel.org> <20170428070935.GC10196@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:47:05AM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 28/04/17 08:09, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:25:59PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote: > >> From: Kieran Bingham > >> > >> This is an RFC for the Analog Devices ADV748x driver, and follows on from a > >> previous posting by Niklas Söderlund [0] of an earlier incarnation of this > >> driver. > > > > ... > > > >> This series presents the following patches: > >> > >> [PATCH 1/5] v4l2-subdev: Provide a port mapping for asynchronous > >> [PATCH 2/5] rcar-vin: Match sources against ports if specified. > >> [PATCH 3/5] media: i2c: adv748x: add adv748x driver > >> [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: r8a7795: salvator-x: enable VIN, CSI and ADV7482 > >> [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: r8a7796: salvator-x: enable VIN, CSI and ADV7482 > > > > I am marking the above dts patches as "RFC" and do not plan to apply them > > unless you ping me or repost them. > > Yes, sorry - the whole series was supposed to be marked as RFC, but I didn't > think about it - and apparently only applied the tag to the cover letter. > > Apologies for any confusion. It was clear enough, though an tag RFC in every patch would be better. In any case I was referring to how I have handled these patches in patchwork. Apologies for any confusion. > > Assuming they don't cause any > > regressions I would be happy to consider applying them as soon as their > > dependencies are accepted. > > Does that mean you've done a cursory glance over the content ? :-) Yes, I did take a quick glance. > In this instance, the port numbers need to revert back to a zero-base, > but I would appreciate an eye on how and where I've put the > representation of the physical hdmi/cvbs connectors. Having modified > plenty of DT, but not actually submitted much - I still feel 'new' at it > - so I'm sure I may not have followed the standards quite right yet. Assuming you are talking about where in the DT file the hdmi and cvbs nodes should go, I think this is somewhat arbitrary so long as they are within the top-level node - what you have looks good to me. > The dts patches are based heavily on the previous posting by Niklas, but I have > extended to put the extra hdmi and cvbs links in. > > Regards > -- > Kieran >