From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:60933 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753489AbdGSLx3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jul 2017 07:53:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:53:27 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Sakari Ailus Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk, robh@kernel.org, jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.1 1/1] v4l2-flash: Flash ops aren't mandatory Message-ID: <20170719115327.GA23056@amd> References: <1497433639-13101-6-git-send-email-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20170718173623.7821-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170718173623.7821-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue 2017-07-18 20:36:23, Sakari Ailus wrote: > None of the flash operations are mandatory and therefore there should be > no need for the flash ops structure either. Accept NULL. Well, ok, but is not the flash without any operations kind of useless? Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAllvSDcACgkQMOfwapXb+vLNHgCdGc/m/JaVMaXLphXxDWzJy5Mc URIAn0KblGKmyVta1/J1CSCtDo3Pik+D =Rgsi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--