From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] string.h: work around for increased stack usage
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:02:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171205140220.f9ce6926dc4f12b13a4ccf6a@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205215143.3085755-1-arnd@arndb.de>
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 22:51:19 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> The hardened strlen() function causes rather large stack usage in at
> least one file in the kernel, in particular when CONFIG_KASAN is enabled:
>
> drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-dvb.c: In function 'em28xx_dvb_init':
> drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-dvb.c:2062:1: error: the frame size of 3256 bytes is larger than 204 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
>
> Analyzing this problem led to the discovery that gcc fails to merge the
> stack slots for the i2c_board_info[] structures after we strlcpy() into
> them, due to the 'noreturn' attribute on the source string length check.
>
> I reported this as a gcc bug, but it is unlikely to get fixed for gcc-8,
> since it is relatively easy to work around, and it gets triggered rarely.
> An earlier workaround I did added an empty inline assembly statement
> before the call to fortify_panic(), which works surprisingly well,
> but is really ugly and unintuitive.
>
> This is a new approach to the same problem, this time addressing it by
> not calling the 'extern __real_strnlen()' function for string constants
> where __builtin_strlen() is a compile-time constant and therefore known
> to be safe. We do this by checking if the last character in the string
> is a compile-time constant '\0'. If it is, we can assume that
> strlen() of the string is also constant. As a side-effect, this should
> also improve the object code output for any other call of strlen()
> on a string constant.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
I'll add
Fixes: 6974f0c4555 ("include/linux/string.h: add the option of fortified string.h functions")
to simplify stable@'s life.
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82365
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9980413/
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9974047/
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/string.h
> +++ b/include/linux/string.h
> @@ -259,7 +259,8 @@ __FORTIFY_INLINE __kernel_size_t strlen(const char *p)
> {
> __kernel_size_t ret;
> size_t p_size = __builtin_object_size(p, 0);
> - if (p_size == (size_t)-1)
> + if (p_size == (size_t)-1 ||
> + (__builtin_constant_p(p[p_size - 1]) && p[p_size - 1] == '\0'))
> return __builtin_strlen(p);
> ret = strnlen(p, p_size);
> if (p_size <= ret)
Let's have some sympathy for our poor readers?
--- a/include/linux/string.h~stringh-work-around-for-increased-stack-usage-fix
+++ a/include/linux/string.h
@@ -259,6 +259,8 @@ __FORTIFY_INLINE __kernel_size_t strlen(
{
__kernel_size_t ret;
size_t p_size = __builtin_object_size(p, 0);
+
+ /* Work around gcc excess stack consumption issue */
if (p_size == (size_t)-1 ||
(__builtin_constant_p(p[p_size - 1]) && p[p_size - 1] == '\0'))
return __builtin_strlen(p);
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 21:51 [PATCH] string.h: work around for increased stack usage Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-05 22:02 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-02 8:33 [PATCH v4 4/9] em28xx: fix em28xx_dvb_init for KASAN Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-02 8:40 ` [PATCH] string.h: work around for increased stack usage Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-02 9:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-02 14:07 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-10-03 18:10 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171205140220.f9ce6926dc4f12b13a4ccf6a@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox