public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Patch review
@ 2018-02-28 15:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski
  2018-02-28 15:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2018-02-28 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Media Mailing List; +Cc: Hans Verkuil, Laurent Pinchart

Hi,

I know the "development process and responsibilities" was the main topic 
during the last media summit. Unfortunately I haven't attended it, from 
the etherpad notes I also cannot quite conclude what decisions have been 
made. Have any measures been discussed and agreed upon for cases, when 
patches don't get reviewed for many months, adding up to more than a year 
(in this specific case the first version submitted in June 2016)?

Thanks
Guennadi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch review
  2018-02-28 15:07 Patch review Guennadi Liakhovetski
@ 2018-02-28 15:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
  2018-02-28 15:49   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
  2018-03-08 16:49   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2018-02-28 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guennadi Liakhovetski; +Cc: Linux Media Mailing List, Hans Verkuil

Hi Guennadi,

On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 17:07:00 EET Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I know the "development process and responsibilities" was the main topic
> during the last media summit. Unfortunately I haven't attended it, from
> the etherpad notes I also cannot quite conclude what decisions have been
> made. Have any measures been discussed and agreed upon for cases, when
> patches don't get reviewed for many months, adding up to more than a year
> (in this specific case the first version submitted in June 2016)?

I assume you're talking about the "[PATCH 0/2 v6] uvcvideo: asynchronous 
controls" series, is that correct ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch review
  2018-02-28 15:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2018-02-28 15:49   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
  2018-03-08 16:49   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2018-02-28 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: Linux Media Mailing List, Hans Verkuil

Hi Laurent,

Yes, that's correct.

Thanks
Guennadi

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> Hi Guennadi,
> 
> On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 17:07:00 EET Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I know the "development process and responsibilities" was the main topic
> > during the last media summit. Unfortunately I haven't attended it, from
> > the etherpad notes I also cannot quite conclude what decisions have been
> > made. Have any measures been discussed and agreed upon for cases, when
> > patches don't get reviewed for many months, adding up to more than a year
> > (in this specific case the first version submitted in June 2016)?
> 
> I assume you're talking about the "[PATCH 0/2 v6] uvcvideo: asynchronous 
> controls" series, is that correct ?
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch review
  2018-02-28 15:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
  2018-02-28 15:49   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
@ 2018-03-08 16:49   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2018-03-08 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Pinchart
  Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski, Linux Media Mailing List, Hans Verkuil

Em Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:21:27 +0200
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> escreveu:

> Hi Guennadi,
> 
> On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 17:07:00 EET Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I know the "development process and responsibilities" was the main topic
> > during the last media summit. Unfortunately I haven't attended it, from
> > the etherpad notes I also cannot quite conclude what decisions have been
> > made. Have any measures been discussed and agreed upon for cases, when
> > patches don't get reviewed for many months, adding up to more than a year
> > (in this specific case the first version submitted in June 2016)?  
> 
> I assume you're talking about the "[PATCH 0/2 v6] uvcvideo: asynchronous 
> controls" series, is that correct ?

What's the situation of such patch review? In case you doesn't have the
original e-mail anymore, I asked Guennadi on IRC to resubmit it, in order
to make easier for us to review/comment about any issues there, if any.

Regards,
Mauro

Thanks,
Mauro

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-03-08 16:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-28 15:07 Patch review Guennadi Liakhovetski
2018-02-28 15:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-28 15:49   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2018-03-08 16:49   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox