From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from osg.samsung.com ([64.30.133.232]:58992 "EHLO osg.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933906AbeCHQtM (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:49:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 13:49:06 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski , Linux Media Mailing List , Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: Patch review Message-ID: <20180308134906.68809c3d@vento.lan> In-Reply-To: <1552444.87XHR44T4u@avalon> References: <1552444.87XHR44T4u@avalon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:21:27 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 17:07:00 EET Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I know the "development process and responsibilities" was the main topic > > during the last media summit. Unfortunately I haven't attended it, from > > the etherpad notes I also cannot quite conclude what decisions have been > > made. Have any measures been discussed and agreed upon for cases, when > > patches don't get reviewed for many months, adding up to more than a year > > (in this specific case the first version submitted in June 2016)? > > I assume you're talking about the "[PATCH 0/2 v6] uvcvideo: asynchronous > controls" series, is that correct ? What's the situation of such patch review? In case you doesn't have the original e-mail anymore, I asked Guennadi on IRC to resubmit it, in order to make easier for us to review/comment about any issues there, if any. Regards, Mauro Thanks, Mauro