From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
To: Sam Bobrowicz <sam@elite-embedded.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Mylene Josserand <mylene.josserand@bootlin.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] media: ov5640: Misc cleanup and improvements
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 17:16:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180503151621.onuq77ph32o5euis@flea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFwsNOECP74VKYavSo6RBzzohZ1S69=CVjSP_zYDsBXMhyxMjw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6111 bytes --]
Hi,
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:11:55AM -0700, Sam Bobrowicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 01:11:19 EEST Sam Bobrowicz wrote:
> >> FYI, still hard at work on this. Did some more experiments last week
> >> that seemed to corroborate the clock tree in the spreadsheet. It also
> >> seems that the output of the P divider cell, SCLK cell and MIPI Rate
> >> cell in the spreadsheet must have a ratio of 2x:1x:8x (respectively)
> >> in order for the sensor to work properly on my platform, and that the
> >> SCLK value must be close to the "rate" variable that you calculate and
> >> pass to set_mipi_pclk. Unfortunately, I've only got the sensor working
> >> well for 1080p@15Hz and 720p@30Hz, both with a SCLK of 42MHz (aka
> >> 84:42:336). I'm running experiments now trying to adjust the htot and
> >> vtot values to create different required rates, and also to try to get
> >> faster Mipi rates working. Any information you have on the
> >> requirements of the htot and vtot values with respect to vact and hact
> >> values would likely be helpful.
> >>
> >> I'm also keeping an eye on the scaler clock, which I think may be
> >> affecting certain resolutions, but haven't been able to see it make a
> >> difference yet (see register 0x3824 and 0x460c)
> >>
> >> I plan on pushing a set of patches once I get this figured out, we can
> >> discuss what I should base them on when I get closer to that point.
> >> I'm new to this process :)
> >
> > I'm also interested in getting the ov5640 driver working with MIPI CSI-2.
> > Studying the datasheet and the driver code, I found the stream on sequence to
> > be a bit weird. In particular the configuration of OV5640_REG_IO_MIPI_CTRL00,
> > OV5640_REG_PAD_OUTPUT00 and OV5640_REG_MIPI_CTRL00 caught my attention.
> >
> > OV5640_REG_IO_MIPI_CTRL00 (0x300e) is set to 0x45 in the large array of init
> > mode data and never touched for MIPI CSI-2 (the register is only touched in
> > ov5640_set_stream_dvp). The value means
> >
> > - mipi_lane_mode: 010 is documented as "debug mode", I would have expected 000
> > for one lane or 001 for two lanes.
>
> I noticed this too, but it seems that 010 is the correct value for two
> lane mode. I think this is a typo in the datasheet.
>
> >
> > - MIPI TX PHY power down: 0 is documented as "debug mode" and 1 as "Power down
> > PHY HS TX", so I suppose 0 is correct.
> >
> > - MIPI RX PHY power down: 0 is documented as "debug mode" and 1 as "Power down
> > PHY LP RX module", so I suppose 0 is correct. I however wonder why there's a
> > RX PHY, it could be a typo.
> >
> > - mipi_en: 1 means MIPI enable, which should be correct.
> >
> > - BIT(0) is undocumented.
> >
> > OV5640_REG_PAD_OUTPUT00 (0x3019) isn't initialized explicitly and thus retains
> > its default value of 0x00, and is controlled when starting and stopping the
> > stream where it's set to 0x00 and 0x70 respectively. Bits 6:4 control the
> > "sleep mode" state of lane 2, lane 1 and clock lane respectively, and should
> > be LP11 in my opinion (that's the PHY stop state). However, setting them to
> > 0x00 when starting the stream mean that LP00 is selected as the sleep state at
> > stream start, and LP11 when stopping the stream. Maybe "sleep mode" means
> > LPDT, but I would expect that to be controlled by the idle status bit in
> > register 0x4800.
> >
>
> I did not need to mess with the accesses to 0x3019 in order to get
> things working on my system. I'm not sure of this registers actual
> behavior, but it might affect idling while not streaming (after power
> on). My pipeline currently only powers the sensor while streaming, so
> I might be missing some ramifications of this register.
>
> > OV5640_REG_MIPI_CTRL00 (0x4800) is set to 0x04 in the large array of init mode
> > data, and BIT(5) is then cleared at stream on time and set at stream off time.
> > This means:
> >
> > - Clock lane gate enable: Clock lane is free running
> > - Line sync enable: Do not send line short packets for each line (I assume
> > that's LS/LE)
> > - Lane select: Use lane1 as default data lane.
> > - Idle status: MIPI bus will be LP11 when no packet to transmit. I would have
> > expected the idle status to correspond to LPDT, and thus be LP00 (as opposed
> > to the stop state that should be LP11, which I believe is named "sleep mode"
> > in the datasheet and controlled in register 0x3019).
> >
> > BIT(5) is the clock lane gate enable, so at stream on time the clock is set to
> > free running, and at stream off time to "Gate clock lane when no packet to
> > transmit". Couldn't we always enable clock gating ?
>
> Good question, it might be worth testing. Same as above, I didn't need
> to mess with this reg either.
>
> > Do you have any insight on this ? Have you modified the MIPI CSI-2
> > configuration to get the CSI-2 output working ?
>
> Good news, MIPI is now working on my platform. I had to make several
> changes to how the mipi clocking is calculated in order to get things
> stable, but I think I got it figured out. Maxime's changes were really
> helpful.
>
> I will try to get some patches out today or tomorrow that should get
> you up and running.
>
> Maxime, I'd prefer to create the patches myself for the experience.
> I've read all of the submission guidelines and I understand the
> general process, but how should I submit them to the mailing list
> since they are based to your patches, which are still under review?
> Should I send the patch series to the mailing list myself and just
> mention this patch series, maybe with the In-Reply-To header? Or
> should I just post a link to them here so you can review them and add
> them to a new version of your patch series?
That's definitely something you can do if you want to try it out :)
However, we shouldn't break the bisectability either, so this will
need to be folded into this serie eventually.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-03 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-16 12:36 [PATCH v2 00/12] media: ov5640: Misc cleanup and improvements Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] media: ov5640: Add auto-focus feature Maxime Ripard
2018-04-19 10:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20 19:10 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] media: ov5640: Add light frequency control Maxime Ripard
2018-04-19 9:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-20 19:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-24 11:55 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] media: ov5640: Don't force the auto exposure state at start time Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] media: ov5640: Init properly the SCLK dividers Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] media: ov5640: Change horizontal and vertical resolutions name Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] media: ov5640: Add horizontal and vertical totals Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] media: ov5640: Program the visible resolution Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] media: ov5640: Adjust the clock based on the expected rate Maxime Ripard
2018-04-24 7:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-04-24 19:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-05-02 21:44 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] media: ov5640: Compute the clock rate at runtime Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] media: ov5640: Enhance FPS handling Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] media: ov5640: Add 60 fps support Maxime Ripard
2018-05-15 13:33 ` Hugues FRUCHET
2018-05-17 8:52 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 13:29 ` Hugues FRUCHET
2018-05-18 9:05 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] media: ov5640: Remove duplicate auto-exposure setup Maxime Ripard
2018-04-16 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] media: ov5640: Misc cleanup and improvements Samuel Bobrowicz
2018-04-17 16:01 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-18 23:39 ` Samuel Bobrowicz
2018-04-19 12:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-24 22:11 ` Sam Bobrowicz
2018-04-25 19:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-27 9:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-05-02 18:11 ` Sam Bobrowicz
2018-05-03 15:16 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2018-05-04 10:01 ` Loic Poulain
2018-05-04 21:13 ` Sam Bobrowicz
2018-05-07 8:10 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-05-04 7:26 ` Loic Poulain
2018-05-04 21:26 ` Sam Bobrowicz
2018-05-08 1:00 ` Sam Bobrowicz
2018-05-17 8:50 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180503151621.onuq77ph32o5euis@flea \
--to=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=hugues.fruchet@st.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mylene.josserand@bootlin.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sam@elite-embedded.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox