From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
To: Sam Bobrowicz <sam@elite-embedded.com>
Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Mylene Josserand <mylene.josserand@bootlin.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@st.com>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] media: ov5640: Remove the clocks registers initialization
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 21:54:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180522195437.bay6muqp3uqq5k3z@flea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180521073902.ayky27k5pcyfyyvc@flea>
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 09:39:02AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 07:42:34PM -0700, Sam Bobrowicz wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org> wrote:
> > > On Thursday, May 17, 2018 10:53 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Part of the hardcoded initialization sequence is to set up the proper
> > >> clock
> > >> dividers. However, this is now done dynamically through proper code and as
> > >> such, the static one is now redundant.
> > >>
> > >> Let's remove it.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
> > >> ---
> > >
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >> @@ -625,8 +623,8 @@ static const struct reg_value
> > >> ov5640_setting_30fps_1080P_1920_1080[] = {
> > >> {0x3a0d, 0x04, 0, 0}, {0x3a14, 0x03, 0, 0}, {0x3a15, 0xd8, 0, 0},
> > >> {0x4001, 0x02, 0, 0}, {0x4004, 0x06, 0, 0}, {0x4713, 0x03, 0, 0},
> > >> {0x4407, 0x04, 0, 0}, {0x460b, 0x35, 0, 0}, {0x460c, 0x22, 0, 0},
> > >> - {0x3824, 0x02, 0, 0}, {0x5001, 0x83, 0, 0}, {0x3035, 0x11, 0, 0},
> > >> - {0x3036, 0x54, 0, 0}, {0x3c07, 0x07, 0, 0}, {0x3c08, 0x00, 0, 0},
> > >> + {0x3824, 0x02, 0, 0}, {0x5001, 0x83, 0, 0},
> > >> + {0x3c07, 0x07, 0, 0}, {0x3c08, 0x00, 0, 0},
> > >
> > >
> > > This is the mode that I'm testing with. Previously, the hard-coded registers
> > > here were:
> > >
> > > OV5640_REG_SC_PLL_CTRL1 (0x3035) = 0x11
> > > OV5640_REG_SC_PLL_CTRL2 (0x3036) = 0x54
> > > OV5640_REG_SC_PLL_CTRL3 (0x3037) = 0x07
> > >
> > > Your new code that calculates the clock rates dynamically ends up with
> > > different values however:
> > >
> > > OV5640_REG_SC_PLL_CTRL1 (0x3035) = 0x11
> > > OV5640_REG_SC_PLL_CTRL2 (0x3036) = 0xa8
> > > OV5640_REG_SC_PLL_CTRL3 (0x3037) = 0x03
> > >
> > > Interestingly, leaving the hard-coded values in the array *and* letting
> > > ov5640_set_mipi_pclk() do its thing later still works. So again it seems
> > > that writes to registers after 0x3035/0x3036/0x3037 seem to depend on the
> > > values of these timing registers. You might need to leave these values as
> > > dummies in the array. Confusing.
> > >
> > > Any idea?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Daniel
> >
> > This set of patches is also not working for my MIPI platform (mine has
> > a 12 MHz external clock). I am pretty sure is isn't working because it
> > does not include the following, which my tests have found to be
> > necessary:
> >
> > 1) Setting pclk period reg in order to correct DPHY timing.
> > 2) Disabling of MIPI lanes when streaming not enabled.
> > 3) setting mipi_div to 1 when the scaler is disabled
> > 4) Doubling ADC clock on faster resolutions.
>
> Yeah, I left them out because I didn't think this was relevant to this
> patchset but should come as future improvements. However, given that
> it works with the parallel bus, maybe the two first are needed when
> adjusting the rate.
I've checked for the pclk period, and it's hardcoded to the same value
all the time, so I guess this is not the reason it doesn't work on
MIPI CSI anymore.
Daniel, could you test:
http://code.bulix.org/ki6kgz-339327?raw
And let us know the results?
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 8:53 [PATCH v3 00/12] media: ov5640: Misc cleanup and improvements Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] media: ov5640: Fix timings setup code Maxime Ripard
2018-05-18 8:32 ` Daniel Mack
2018-05-21 7:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] media: ov5640: Adjust the clock based on the expected rate Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] media: ov5640: Remove the clocks registers initialization Maxime Ripard
2018-05-18 10:35 ` Daniel Mack
2018-05-19 2:42 ` Sam Bobrowicz
2018-05-19 5:52 ` Daniel Mack
2018-05-21 7:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-05-22 19:54 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2018-05-23 9:31 ` Daniel Mack
2018-05-24 14:59 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-06-01 23:05 ` Sam Bobrowicz
2018-06-04 16:22 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-06-29 13:51 ` jacopo mondi
2018-05-17 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] media: ov5640: Remove redundant defines Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] media: ov5640: Remove redundant register setup Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] media: ov5640: Compute the clock rate at runtime Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] media: ov5640: Remove pixel clock rates Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] media: ov5640: Enhance FPS handling Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] media: ov5640: Make the return rate type more explicit Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] media: ov5640: Make the FPS clamping / rounding more extendable Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] media: ov5640: Add 60 fps support Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] media: ov5640: Remove duplicate auto-exposure setup Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 9:24 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] media: ov5640: Misc cleanup and improvements Daniel Mack
2018-05-17 11:22 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-05-17 11:30 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-09-27 15:59 ` Hugues FRUCHET
2018-09-28 16:05 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-10-01 14:12 ` Hugues FRUCHET
2018-10-04 15:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-10-04 15:17 ` Hugues FRUCHET
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180522195437.bay6muqp3uqq5k3z@flea \
--to=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=daniel@zonque.org \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=hugues.fruchet@st.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mylene.josserand@bootlin.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sam@elite-embedded.com \
--cc=slongerbeam@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox