Re: Software-only image processing for Intel "complex" cameras

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1175 bytes --]

Hi!

> > On Nokia N900, I have similar problems as Intel IPU3 hardware.
> > 
> > Meeting notes say that pure software implementation is not fast
> > enough, but that it may be useful for debugging. It would be also
> > useful for me on N900, and probably useful for processing "raw"
> > images
> > from digital cameras.
> > 
> > There is sensor part, and memory-to-memory part, right? What is
> > the format of data from the sensor part? What operations would be
> > expensive on the CPU? If we did everthing on the CPU, what would be
> > maximum resolution where we could still manage it in real time?
> 
> The IPU3 sensor produce a vendor specific form of bayer. If we manage
> to implement support for this format, it would likely be done in
> software. I don't think anyone can answer your other questions has no
> one have ever implemented this, hence measure performance.

I believe Intel has some estimates.

What is the maximum resolution of camera in the current Dell systems?

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]