linux-media.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Make entity to interface links immutable
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:24:34 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180702092434.45122d73@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99caf821-16f9-baa9-4e97-36d91e25d1ac@xs4all.nl>

Em Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:38:23 +0200
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> escreveu:

> On 02/07/18 11:41, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:18:37 +0200
> > Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> escreveu:
> >   
> >> While working on v4l2-compliance I noticed that entity to interface links
> >> have just the MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED flag set.
> >>
> >> Shouldn't we also set the MEDIA_LNK_FL_IMMUTABLE? After all, you cannot change
> >> an entity-interface link. It feels inconsistent not to have this flag.  
> > 
> > It could make sense for non-hybrid devices, but this may not be true
> > for hybrid ones. See below.
> >   
> >> I also propose that media_create_intf_link() drops the last flags argument:
> >> it can set the link flags directly since they are always the same anyway.  
> > 
> > When we came with this design, the idea is that an interface can be 
> > disabled/enabled at runtime, if the entity it links can't be used,
> > because the hardware is busy doing something else. 
> > 
> > That could happen with hybrid devices, where the analog part could
> > be consuming resources that would be needed for the digital part.
> > 
> > Disabling the link at runtime has an advantage that it makes easier
> > to check - as open() syscalls could just use it to return -EBUSY,
> > instead of doing a complete graph analysis. Also, applications can
> > test it directly, in order to have a hint if a device is ready for
> > usage.
> > 
> > That was one of the approaches we considered at the design, but I
> > don't remember if Shuah's patch series actually used it or not,
> > as I don't look at her pending patches for a long time. I suspect
> > she took a different approach.
> > 
> > Anyway, before touching it, I'd like to see her patches merged,
> > and do some tests with real case scenarios before changing it.  
> 
> Hmm, this also highlights another deficiency in the spec. Currently
> the description of IMMUTABLE says:
> 
> "The link enabled state can’t be modified at runtime. An immutable link
>  is always enabled."
> 
> But in the plan above the link can change, but only the driver can
> enable/disable the link. It makes no sense AFAICS for userspace to
> enable/disable an interface link.
> 
> If I am right that it makes no sense for userspace to disable an interface
> link, then we should update the spec to clarify that this is not allowed
> (in fact, it is not possible today anyway). And we should also clarify
> that the driver can disable an interface link and what that means.
> 
> If userspace CAN in some circumstances disable an interface link, then
> we need to add something like a READ_ONLY flag to signal whether or not
> userspace can change an interface link. If it is READ_ONLY, then only the
> driver can change that.

Yes, this makes sense.

> 
> That said, given that today there are no drivers that disable an interface
> link, I still think that we should mark them all as IMMUTABLE. That flag
> can be removed when we actually let drivers change this.

Ok, let's do this, but without touching at the media_create_intf_link(),
as we need first to apply Shuah's patch, and see how we'll handle,
before start stripping code that will probably be needed.

> 
> It would be consistent with the current usage of interface links.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	Hans



Thanks,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-02 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-02  8:18 [RFC] Make entity to interface links immutable Hans Verkuil
2018-07-02  9:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-07-02 10:38   ` Hans Verkuil
2018-07-02 12:24     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2018-07-09 15:21   ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180702092434.45122d73@coco.lan \
    --to=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).