From: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
mchehab@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] SoC camera: Remove the framework and the drivers
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 21:28:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181030202857.GH15991@w540> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181030091409.76b07620@coco.lan>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3954 bytes --]
Hi Mauro,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 09:14:09AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 30 Oct 2018 01:21:34 +0200
> Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> escreveu:
>
> > The SoC camera framework has been obsolete for some time and it is no
> > longer functional. A few drivers have been converted to the V4L2
> > sub-device API but for the rest the conversion has not taken place yet.
> >
> > In order to keep the tree clean and to avoid keep maintaining
> > non-functional and obsolete code, remove the SoC camera framework as well
> > as the drivers that depend on it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > Resending, this time with git format-patch -D .
> >
> > MAINTAINERS | 8 -
> > drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 8 -
> > drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 1 -
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/Kconfig | 66 -
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/Makefile | 10 -
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov9640.h | 208 --
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_mt9m001.c | 757 -------
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_mt9t112.c | 1157 -----------
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_mt9v022.c | 1012 ---------
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_ov5642.c | 1087 ----------
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_ov772x.c | 1123 ----------
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_ov9640.c | 738 -------
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_ov9740.c | 996 ---------
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_rj54n1cb0c.c | 1415 -------------
> > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_tw9910.c | 999 ---------
>
> I don't see why we should remove those. I mean, Jacopo is
> actually converting those drivers to not depend on soc_camera,
> and it is a way better to review those patches with the old
> code in place.
I have converted a few drivers used by some SH boards where I dropped
dependencies on soc_camera, not to remove camera support from those. For
others I don't have cameras to test with, nor I know about boards in
mainline using them.
From my side, driver conversion is done.
>
> So, at least while Jacopo is keep doing this work, I would keep
> at Kernel tree, as it helps to see a diff when the driver changes
> when getting rid of soc_camera dependencies.
>
> So, IMO, the best would be to move those to /staging, eventually
> depending on BROKEN.
However, somebody with a (rather old) development setup using those camera
sensor may wants to see if mainline supports them. We actually had a
few patches coming lately (for ov. I understand Sakari's argument that those
could be retrieved from git history, but a few people will notice imo.
I also understand the additional maintainership burden of keeping them
around, so I'm fine with either ways ;)
This is a list of the current situation in mainline, to have a better
idea:
$for i in `seq 1 9`; do CAM=$(head -n $i /tmp/soc_cams | tail -n 1); echo $CAM; find drivers/media/ -name $CAM; done
t9m001.c
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9m001.c
mt9t112.c
drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9t112.c
mt9v022.c
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9v022.c
ov5642.c
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov5642.c
ov772x.c
drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov772x.c
ov9640.c
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov9640.c
ov9740.c
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov9740.c
rj54n1cb0c.c
drivers/media/i2c/rj54n1cb0c.c
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/rj54n1cb0c.c
tw9910.c
drivers/media/i2c/tw9910.c
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/tw9910.c
So it seems to me only the following sensor do not have a
non-soc_camera driver at the moment:
mt9m001.c
mt9v022.c
ov5642.c
ov9640.c
ov9740.c
Thanks
j
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-31 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-29 23:00 [PATCH 0/4] SoC camera removal Sakari Ailus
2018-10-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] tw9910: Unregister async subdev at device unbind Sakari Ailus
2018-10-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] tw9910: No SoC camera dependency Sakari Ailus
2018-10-30 12:03 ` Hans Verkuil
2018-10-31 9:49 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-10-31 9:50 ` Hans Verkuil
2018-10-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] SoC camera: Tidy the header Sakari Ailus
2018-10-30 9:50 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-30 12:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-31 9:29 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-10-31 9:40 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-31 9:44 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-10-31 9:57 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-10-31 10:00 ` Hans Verkuil
2018-10-31 10:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-11-13 22:41 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] SoC camera: Remove the framework and the drivers Sakari Ailus
2018-10-30 9:43 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-30 12:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-30 12:09 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-30 12:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-30 20:28 ` jacopo mondi [this message]
2018-10-30 20:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-30 21:17 ` jacopo mondi
2018-10-31 9:12 ` Hans Verkuil
2018-10-31 9:32 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-10-31 10:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181030202857.GH15991@w540 \
--to=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox