From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072F1C65BAF for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 13:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C9220892 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 13:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ly0EHkfH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B5C9220892 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726126AbeLHNLt (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2018 08:11:49 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com ([209.85.160.194]:44879 "EHLO mail-qt1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726121AbeLHNLt (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2018 08:11:49 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id n32so7580972qte.11; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 05:11:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=woh+MkfLHQzFXhkzBgmfQ8EJ6mnVyeDQkKoJcxYaR2M=; b=ly0EHkfHxPpGr6YmHFk5EFn4IRADi1POjsT7ngGgutiogEbHB5U1B3ftUGLr+uK1JJ I7Sjg65VooTtXLBc9PzEobkm5XIgtNeP/TP9+T1W4kZan5HuYIO88toci8T60hMXI6qJ 3BxWACNdhAjdToKp9JYOt6MORoKnx9T4sDvIeKBpX7ivqxgTijK+T/Pb46/SsEKRnN+k jpUY5rXdV8WrAq4lEO/N/XPtTWNrM+7xsTEgSq8FmQfYqR+c42MGNZv8DpfwE9DsYgOW l3boKbPW5V3feKok8+F3Vei5UU2zurTgNdsZxY0QXRhZAsTgK3pIXNjKyHjW0nz+NBWA /i9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=woh+MkfLHQzFXhkzBgmfQ8EJ6mnVyeDQkKoJcxYaR2M=; b=k1vSV89jBhvz0I6R0FxMsI01t42mB91TM8i4hwglBN9nIghvRLGznnhqQw/G8boopT 83PijZdu+EnmQy9+Lc9mXmicftR3DYYv0z8v32Rs8MYZVFjEr5F9f6gbG/+Qp5vnfJjJ TeKkHv+e2dLLdW28ZDALC/YzbRTWEzodyocc6yYXalaBJhxGYucklA+woGYBq7zwgsy6 ZVnjREflaKjEEwQtzy1ARJQKq40ovFiEYe63sUXvJLsS81g8tI/MM5TPs4xSAPjyEpiq gP/tFdF+fQzqIRxLc38tYgUflUa4Si4TmrWE4UpXAdSrCNlU7gi7EPxLDhj6SuiU0eME Jz3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWa0Pm1jPkL89HkV6d8W5qFVKqPDg+xMx3DtWixcPnD8gpP40JWz 6vaDpivm5BAz1jY+4bsEX+8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Wf6l/dQZNZJa7GIFS99A4CQLW0bLOHZtzLA4ju8VrZr9yUy6vgwAldkLPQluyC3iq4EkNKSg== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9471:: with SMTP id i46mr5395311qvi.120.1544274707985; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 05:11:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from gfm-ubuntu ([2804:14c:482:ff6:7125:16d4:3eab:35b4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c48sm4126072qtd.9.2018.12.08.05.11.46 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Dec 2018 05:11:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 11:11:44 -0200 From: Gabriel Francisco Mandaji To: Hans Verkuil Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkcamp@lists.libreplanetbr.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: vivid: Improve timestamping Message-ID: <20181208131144.GA6645@gfm-ubuntu> References: <20181202134538.GA18886@gfm-note> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Hi Hans, > I decided to accept this patch. The only change I made was to replace the > do_div(f_period, 2) by a bit shift. > > Thanks for working on this! OK, thanks for accepting the patch! I'll pay attention to those details when working on the following patches. > Can you look at adding the same support for the video output as well? > And also SDR capture (in a separate patch). Yes, for sure! I probably won't start working on those until next week, but I'll start by the video output. It'll hopefully go a lot smoother this time. Regards, Gabriel F. Mandaji