From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To: hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 1/4] uapi/linux/media.h: add property support
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:41:13 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181213144113.713ce59c@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181213134113.15247-2-hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Em Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:41:10 +0100
hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl escreveu:
> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
>
> Extend the topology struct with a properties array.
>
> Add a new media_v2_prop structure to store property information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/media.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/media.h b/include/uapi/linux/media.h
> index e5d0c5c611b5..12982327381e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/media.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/media.h
> @@ -342,6 +342,58 @@ struct media_v2_link {
> __u32 reserved[6];
> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> +#define MEDIA_PROP_TYPE_GROUP 1
> +#define MEDIA_PROP_TYPE_U64 2
> +#define MEDIA_PROP_TYPE_S64 3
> +#define MEDIA_PROP_TYPE_STRING 4
> +#define MEDIA_OWNER_TYPE_ENTITY 0
> +#define MEDIA_OWNER_TYPE_PAD 1
> +#define MEDIA_OWNER_TYPE_LINK 2
> +#define MEDIA_OWNER_TYPE_INTF 3
> +#define MEDIA_OWNER_TYPE_PROP 4
> +
> +/**
> + * struct media_v2_prop - A media property
> + *
> + * @id: The unique non-zero ID of this property
> + * @type: Property type
> + * @owner_id: The ID of the object this property belongs to
I'm in doubt about this. With this field, properties and objects
will have a 1:1 mapping. If this is removed, it would be possible
to map 'n' objects to a single property (N:1 mapping), with could
be interesting.
> + * @owner_type: The type of the object this property belongs to
I would remove this (and the corresponding defines). The type
can easily be identified from the owner_id - as it already contains
the object type embedded at the ID.
In other words, it is:
owner_type = (owner_id & MEDIA_ENT_TYPE_MASK) >> MEDIA_ENT_TYPE_SHIFT;
> + * @flags: Property flags
> + * @name: Property name
> + * @payload_size: Property payload size, 0 for U64/S64
> + * @payload_offset: Property payload starts at this offset from &prop.id.
> + * This is 0 for U64/S64.
Please specify how this will be used for the group type, with is not
obvious. I *suspect* that, on a group, you'll be adding a vector of
u32 (cpu endian) and payload_size is the number of elements at the
vector (or the vector size?).
> + * @reserved: Property reserved field, will be zeroed.
> + */
> +struct media_v2_prop {
> + __u32 id;
> + __u32 type;
> + __u32 owner_id;
> + __u32 owner_type;
> + __u32 flags;
The way it is defined, name won't be 64-bits aligned (well, it will, if
you remove the owner_type).
> + char name[32];
> + __u32 payload_size;
> + __u32 payload_offset;
> + __u32 reserved[18];
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> +
> +static inline const char *media_prop2string(const struct media_v2_prop *prop)
> +{
> + return (const char *)prop + prop->payload_offset;
> +}
> +
> +static inline __u64 media_prop2u64(const struct media_v2_prop *prop)
> +{
> + return *(const __u64 *)((const char *)prop + prop->payload_offset);
> +}
> +
> +static inline __s64 media_prop2s64(const struct media_v2_prop *prop)
> +{
> + return *(const __s64 *)((const char *)prop + prop->payload_offset);
> +}
> +
Shouldn't you define also a media_prop2group()?
> struct media_v2_topology {
> __u64 topology_version;
>
> @@ -360,6 +412,10 @@ struct media_v2_topology {
> __u32 num_links;
> __u32 reserved4;
> __u64 ptr_links;
> +
> + __u32 num_props;
> + __u32 props_payload_size;
> + __u64 ptr_props;
Please document those new fields.
> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> /* ioctls */
Thanks,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-13 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-13 13:41 [RFCv5 PATCH 0/4] Add properties support to the media controller hverkuil-cisco
2018-12-13 13:41 ` [RFCv5 PATCH 1/4] uapi/linux/media.h: add property support hverkuil-cisco
2018-12-13 16:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2018-12-13 17:13 ` Hans Verkuil
2018-12-13 17:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-12-13 17:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-12-13 13:41 ` [RFCv5 PATCH 2/4] media controller: add properties support hverkuil-cisco
2018-12-13 17:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-12-13 17:35 ` Hans Verkuil
2018-12-13 18:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-12-13 13:41 ` [RFCv5 PATCH 3/4] media: add functions to add properties to objects hverkuil-cisco
2018-12-13 17:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-12-13 13:41 ` [RFCv5 PATCH 4/4] vimc: add property test code hverkuil-cisco
2018-12-13 17:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181213144113.713ce59c@coco.lan \
--to=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).