From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 05/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Streamlined vb2 buffer cleanup
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:53:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916145356.wddnnl3kk2awmbf4@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8ub2rjkp0WyUDV8EKnvqR=jCbCdxGzeeNas2APyiJdsYg@mail.gmail.com>
Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote on Mon [2019-Sep-16 09:00:03 +0100]:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 5:26 PM Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > Returning queued vb2 buffers back to user space is a common
> > task best handled by a helper function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/platform/am437x/am437x-vpfe.c | 54 ++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/am437x/am437x-vpfe.c b/drivers/media/platform/am437x/am437x-vpfe.c
> > index 3a8ad9bdf283..52f7fc6e11dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/am437x/am437x-vpfe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/am437x/am437x-vpfe.c
> > @@ -1949,6 +1949,29 @@ static void vpfe_buffer_queue(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vpfe->dma_queue_lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > +static void vpfe_return_all_buffers(struct vpfe_device *vpfe,
> > + enum vb2_buffer_state state)
> > +{
> > + struct vpfe_cap_buffer *buf, *node;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vpfe->dma_queue_lock, flags);
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, node, &vpfe->dma_queue, list) {
> > + vb2_buffer_done(&buf->vb.vb2_buf, state);
> > + list_del(&buf->list);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vpfe->cur_frm)
> > + vb2_buffer_done(&vpfe->cur_frm->vb.vb2_buf, state);
> > +
> > + if (vpfe->next_frm && vpfe->next_frm != vpfe->cur_frm)
> > + vb2_buffer_done(&vpfe->next_frm->vb.vb2_buf, state);
> > +
> > + vpfe->cur_frm = NULL;
> > + vpfe->next_frm = NULL;
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vpfe->dma_queue_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * vpfe_start_streaming : Starts the DMA engine for streaming
> > * @vb: ptr to vb2_buffer
> > @@ -1957,7 +1980,6 @@ static void vpfe_buffer_queue(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> > static int vpfe_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int count)
> > {
> > struct vpfe_device *vpfe = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
> > - struct vpfe_cap_buffer *buf, *tmp;
> > struct vpfe_subdev_info *sdinfo;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned long addr;
> > @@ -2003,11 +2025,8 @@ static int vpfe_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int count)
> > return 0;
> >
> > err:
> > - list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, tmp, &vpfe->dma_queue, list) {
> > - list_del(&buf->list);
> > - vb2_buffer_done(&buf->vb.vb2_buf, VB2_BUF_STATE_QUEUED);
> > - }
> > -
> > + vpfe_return_all_buffers(vpfe, VB2_BUF_STATE_QUEUED);
> > + vpfe_pcr_enable(&vpfe->ccdc, 0);
>
> please create a seperate patch for the above change.
You mean a separate patch just for the vpfe_pcr_enable() call?
Benoit
>
> Cheers,
> --Prabhakar Lad
>
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2022,7 +2041,6 @@ static void vpfe_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq)
> > {
> > struct vpfe_device *vpfe = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
> > struct vpfe_subdev_info *sdinfo;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > int ret;
> >
> > vpfe_pcr_enable(&vpfe->ccdc, 0);
> > @@ -2040,27 +2058,7 @@ static void vpfe_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq)
> > vpfe_dbg(1, vpfe, "stream off failed in subdev\n");
> >
> > /* release all active buffers */
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vpfe->dma_queue_lock, flags);
> > - if (vpfe->cur_frm == vpfe->next_frm) {
> > - vb2_buffer_done(&vpfe->cur_frm->vb.vb2_buf,
> > - VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
> > - } else {
> > - if (vpfe->cur_frm != NULL)
> > - vb2_buffer_done(&vpfe->cur_frm->vb.vb2_buf,
> > - VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
> > - if (vpfe->next_frm != NULL)
> > - vb2_buffer_done(&vpfe->next_frm->vb.vb2_buf,
> > - VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
> > - }
> > -
> > - while (!list_empty(&vpfe->dma_queue)) {
> > - vpfe->next_frm = list_entry(vpfe->dma_queue.next,
> > - struct vpfe_cap_buffer, list);
> > - list_del(&vpfe->next_frm->list);
> > - vb2_buffer_done(&vpfe->next_frm->vb.vb2_buf,
> > - VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
> > - }
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vpfe->dma_queue_lock, flags);
> > + vpfe_return_all_buffers(vpfe, VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
> > }
> >
> > static int vpfe_g_pixelaspect(struct file *file, void *priv,
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-09 16:27 [Patch 00/13] media: am437x-vpfe: overdue maintenance Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 01/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Fix suspend path to always handle pinctrl config Benoit Parrot
2019-09-13 12:59 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-13 13:24 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 02/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Fix missing first line Benoit Parrot
2019-09-13 13:00 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-13 13:25 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 03/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Rework ISR routine for clarity Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 04/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Wait for end of frame before tear-down Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 05/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Streamlined vb2 buffer cleanup Benoit Parrot
2019-09-16 8:00 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2019-09-16 14:53 ` Benoit Parrot [this message]
2019-09-16 16:02 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 06/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Setting STD to current value is not an error Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 07/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Use a per instance format array instead of a static one Benoit Parrot
2019-09-13 13:07 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-13 13:29 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-09-17 16:19 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 08/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Maintain a reference to the current vpfe_fmt Benoit Parrot
2019-09-13 13:14 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-13 13:32 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-09-13 13:34 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-13 13:43 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 09/13] media: am437x-vpfe: fix function trace debug log Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:54 ` Joe Perches
2019-09-09 17:14 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 10/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Remove print_fourcc helper Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:39 ` Joe Perches
2019-09-09 17:12 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 11/13] media: am437x-vpfe: TRY_FMT ioctl is not really trying anything Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 12/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Remove per bus width static data Benoit Parrot
2019-09-13 13:19 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-13 13:34 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-09-09 16:27 ` [Patch 13/13] media: am437x-vpfe: Switch to SPDX Licensing Benoit Parrot
2019-09-10 10:42 ` [Patch 00/13] media: am437x-vpfe: overdue maintenance Hans Verkuil
2019-09-10 16:20 ` Benoit Parrot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190916145356.wddnnl3kk2awmbf4@ti.com \
--to=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox