From: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] media: ov6650: Simplify clock divisor calculation
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:50:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191013125050.4153-4-jmkrzyszt@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191013125050.4153-1-jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
As appears from an analysis of to_clkrc() helper code after its
pclk_limit argument has been dropped, its result no longer depends on
another argument - pclk_max. Moreover, assuming that a constant value
of FRAME_RATE_MAX is always used as a denominator of the only
significant argument left - a struct v4l2_fract, the result in fact
depends only on the numerator value of that argument. As a further
consequence, it no longer makes sense to recalculate frame intervals by
converting them forth and back with a GET_CLKRC_DIV(to_clkrc(tpf))
construct.
Drop use of GET_CLKRC_DIV() on results of to_clkrc() where possible -
use the frame interval value directly. Furthermore, replace the
to_clkrc() helper function with a simple macro and update its users to
always use FRAME_RATE_MAX as frame interval denominator and pass only
its numerator as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
---
drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c | 29 +++++------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c
index a50244401491..61ddd4ea4c26 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c
@@ -545,18 +545,7 @@ static bool is_unscaled_ok(int width, int height, struct v4l2_rect *rect)
return width > rect->width >> 1 || height > rect->height >> 1;
}
-static u8 to_clkrc(struct v4l2_fract *timeperframe, unsigned long pclk_max)
-{
- unsigned long pclk;
-
- if (timeperframe->numerator && timeperframe->denominator)
- pclk = pclk_max * timeperframe->denominator /
- (FRAME_RATE_MAX * timeperframe->numerator);
- else
- pclk = pclk_max;
-
- return (pclk_max - 1) / pclk;
-}
+#define to_clkrc(div) ((div) - 1)
/* set the format we will capture in */
static int ov6650_s_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mf)
@@ -650,7 +639,7 @@ static int ov6650_s_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mf)
mclk = 12000000;
dev_dbg(&client->dev, "using 12MHz input clock\n");
- clkrc |= to_clkrc(&priv->tpf, priv->pclk_max);
+ clkrc |= to_clkrc(priv->tpf.numerator);
pclk = priv->pclk_max / GET_CLKRC_DIV(clkrc);
dev_dbg(&client->dev, "pixel clock divider: %ld.%ld\n",
@@ -749,9 +738,7 @@ static int ov6650_g_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
struct ov6650 *priv = to_ov6650(client);
- ival->interval.numerator = GET_CLKRC_DIV(to_clkrc(&priv->tpf,
- priv->pclk_max));
- ival->interval.denominator = FRAME_RATE_MAX;
+ ival->interval = priv->tpf;
dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Frame interval: %u/%u s\n",
ival->interval.numerator, ival->interval.denominator);
@@ -766,7 +753,6 @@ static int ov6650_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
struct ov6650 *priv = to_ov6650(client);
struct v4l2_fract *tpf = &ival->interval;
int div, ret;
- u8 clkrc;
if (tpf->numerator == 0 || tpf->denominator == 0)
div = 1; /* Reset to full rate */
@@ -778,14 +764,9 @@ static int ov6650_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
else if (div > GET_CLKRC_DIV(CLKRC_DIV_MASK))
div = GET_CLKRC_DIV(CLKRC_DIV_MASK);
- tpf->numerator = div;
- tpf->denominator = FRAME_RATE_MAX;
-
- clkrc = to_clkrc(tpf, priv->pclk_max);
-
- ret = ov6650_reg_rmw(client, REG_CLKRC, clkrc, CLKRC_DIV_MASK);
+ ret = ov6650_reg_rmw(client, REG_CLKRC, to_clkrc(div), CLKRC_DIV_MASK);
if (!ret) {
- priv->tpf.numerator = GET_CLKRC_DIV(clkrc);
+ priv->tpf.numerator = div;
priv->tpf.denominator = FRAME_RATE_MAX;
*tpf = priv->tpf;
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-13 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-13 12:50 [PATCH 0/6] media: ov6650: Master and pixel clock handling fixes Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-10-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] media: ov6650: Fix stored frame interval not in sync with hardware Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-10-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] media: ov6650: Drop obsolete .pclk_limit attribute Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-10-13 12:50 ` Janusz Krzysztofik [this message]
2019-10-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] media: ov6650: Don't reapply pixel clock divisor on format change Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-10-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] media: ov6650: Drop unused .pclk_max field Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-10-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] media: ov6650: Fix arbitrary selection of master clock rate Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-10-18 18:54 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-10-18 19:11 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191013125050.4153-4-jmkrzyszt@gmail.com \
--to=jmkrzyszt@gmail.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox