From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
To: "Daniel W. S. Almeida" <dwlsalmeida@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rfontana@redhat.com,
kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: dvb_dummy_fe.c: add members to dvb_dummy_fe_state
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 06:50:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191202065047.3cffda7a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13629649-f363-4787-e88b-784f8309bfcd@gmail.com>
Em Mon, 2 Dec 2019 01:49:38 -0300
"Daniel W. S. Almeida" <dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hi Mauro, thanks for checking out my work!
>
> > please don't add fields at the
> > struct while they're not used, as this makes harder for reviewers to be
> > sure that we're not adding bloatware at the code.
>
> OK.
>
> > Please remember that
> > we want one logical change per patch.
> >
> > It means that, if you add a state->frontend_status at the driver, the
> > patch should implement the entire logic for it.
> I will keep this in mind.
>
> > static int dvb_dummy_fe_sleep(struct dvb_frontend* fe)
> > {
> > +
> > + struct dvb_dummy_fe_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
> > +
> > + state->sleeping = true;
> > +
>
> > Hmm...what's the sense of adding it? Where are you setting it to false?
> > Where are you using the sleeping state?
>
> I noted some drivers seem to instruct the hardware into a low power state. Take helene, for instance:
>
> static int helene_sleep(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
> {
> struct helene_priv *priv = fe->tuner_priv;
>
> dev_dbg(&priv->i2c->dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
> helene_enter_power_save(priv);
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int helene_enter_power_save(struct helene_priv *priv)
> {
> dev_dbg(&priv->i2c->dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
> if (priv->state == STATE_SLEEP)
> return 0;
>
> /* Standby setting for CPU */
> helene_write_reg(priv, 0x88, 0x0);
>
> /* Standby setting for internal logic block */
> helene_write_reg(priv, 0x87, 0xC0);
>
> priv->state = STATE_SLEEP;
> return 0;
> }
>
> As we are emulating some piece of hardware I thought it would be enough to add a simple bool to indicate that the device was sleeping.
Yeah, that could have some value. Yet, if you're doing that, I suggest
to add a function to change the device power state, as this is what a
real driver would do. Something similar to:
static inline void change_power_state(struct state *st, bool on)
{
/* A real driver would have commands here to wake/sleep the dev */
st->power = on;
}
In any case, a real device on sleeping mode will not be tuning any
channels, so all stats will reflect that, e. g:
- frontend status will return 0;
- stats that depends on having a lock will be set with:
FE_SCALE_NOT_AVAILABLE
tip: most stats are like that
- stats like signal strength should probably return 0.
Not so sure what SNR will return, but probably it should return
FE_SCALE_NOT_AVAILABLE too, as this is usually calculated indirectly
once the device is locked.
On other words, only signal strength and stats should return a value
with would be 0 on both cases. All other stats should return
FE_SCALE_NOT_AVAILABLE.
Btw, as this depends on having the stats implemented, I would suggest you to
first finish the tuning and stats part of the driver. Only after having those
patches, apply the power mode patch.
>
> This patch was a bit convoluted on my part. Let's iron out the issues you pointed out in v2.
>
> - Daniel.
Cheers,
Mauro
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-02 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-30 4:54 [PATCH] media: dvb_dummy_fe.c: add members to dvb_dummy_fe_state Daniel W. S. Almeida
2019-12-01 8:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[not found] ` <13629649-f363-4787-e88b-784f8309bfcd@gmail.com>
2019-12-02 5:50 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191202065047.3cffda7a@kernel.org \
--to=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=dwlsalmeida@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rfontana@redhat.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).