From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0936C1975A for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 23:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A630206EC for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 23:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="OQyPMDPt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726721AbgCQXEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 19:04:41 -0400 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([213.167.242.64]:59504 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726549AbgCQXEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 19:04:41 -0400 Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (81-175-216-236.bb.dnainternet.fi [81.175.216.236]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C3FBF9; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:04:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1584486278; bh=DdAdb8ZUU2/ZUnpDDbM2QIE7bXtcmbyw6yhTln1Zh68=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OQyPMDPts83hWJImo2O0ukpZEBKoEYwD3z7/Mncle5IrtbvUxwAw2dpVp0e0xWHk2 9eBCOiE4d13SCfSRqJroYJnhLfz3nDEKbWiVyKXszcSWSuVZxzp4LTNXTTvaiPhldt PQ27Sq999NyC7o03tnrdMuNcP6zAaPwM/fOIsvgg= Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 01:04:32 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Laurent Pinchart , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Jacopo Mondi , Niklas =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=B6derlund?= , Kieran Bingham , Lad Prabhakar Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: v4l2-async: Accept endpoints and devices for fwnode matching Message-ID: <20200317230432.GO2527@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20200315102724.26850-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20200315125511.25756-1-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <20200317124455.GC13878@kekkonen.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200317124455.GC13878@kekkonen.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Hi Sakari, On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 02:55:11PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > fwnode matching was designed to match on nodes corresponding to a > > device. Some drivers, however, needed to match on endpoints, and have > > passed endpoint fwnodes to v4l2-async. This works when both the subdev > > and the notifier use the same fwnode types (endpoint or device), but > > makes drivers that use different types incompatible. > > > > Fix this by extending the fwnode match to handle fwnodes of different > > types. When the types (deduced from the node name) are different, > > retrieve the device fwnode for the side that provides an endpoint > > fwnode, and compare it with the device fwnode provided by the other > > side. This allows interoperability between all drivers, regardless of > > which type of fwnode they use for matching. > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > > --- > > This has been compile-tested only. Prabhakar, could you check if it > > fixes your issue ? > > > > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c > > index 8bde33c21ce4..995e5464cba7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c > > @@ -71,7 +71,47 @@ static bool match_devname(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > > > > static bool match_fwnode(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd) > > { > > - return sd->fwnode == asd->match.fwnode; > > + struct fwnode_handle *other_fwnode; > > + struct fwnode_handle *dev_fwnode; > > + bool asd_fwnode_is_ep; > > + bool sd_fwnode_is_ep; > > + const char *name; > > + > > + /* > > + * Both the subdev and the async subdev can provide either an endpoint > > + * fwnode or a device fwnode. Start with the simple case of direct > > + * fwnode matching. > > + */ > > + if (sd->fwnode == asd->match.fwnode) > > + return true; > > + > > + /* > > + * Otherwise, check if the sd fwnode and the asd fwnode refer to an > > + * endpoint or a device. If they're of the same type, there's no match. > > + */ > > + name = fwnode_get_name(sd->fwnode); > > + sd_fwnode_is_ep = name && strstarts(name, "endpoint"); > > + name = fwnode_get_name(asd->match.fwnode); > > + asd_fwnode_is_ep = name && strstarts(name, "endpoint"); > > Apart from the fact that you're parsing graph node names here, this looks > good. > > How about checking instead that calling > fwnode_graph_get_remote_endpoint(fwnode_graph_get_remote_endpoint()) yields > the same node? That would ensure you're dealing with endpoint nodes without > explicitly parsing the graph in any way. Would it be simpler to check for the presence of an endpoint property ? > Just remember to drop the references. > > > + > > + if (sd_fwnode_is_ep == asd_fwnode_is_ep) > > + return false; > > + > > + /* > > + * The sd and asd fwnodes are of different types. Get the device fwnode > > + * parent of the endpoint fwnode, and compare it with the other fwnode. > > + */ > > + if (sd_fwnode_is_ep) { > > + dev_fwnode = fwnode_graph_get_port_parent(sd->fwnode); > > + other_fwnode = asd->match.fwnode; > > + } else { > > + dev_fwnode = fwnode_graph_get_port_parent(asd->match.fwnode); > > + other_fwnode = sd->fwnode; > > + } > > + > > + fwnode_handle_put(dev_fwnode); > > + > > + return dev_fwnode == other_fwnode; > > } > > > > static bool match_custom(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart