Re: [PATCH] dma-fence: add might_sleep annotation to _wait()

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:54:36AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 19.05.20 um 15:27 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > Do it uncontionally, there's a separate peek function with
> > dma_fence_is_signalled() which can be called from atomic context.
> > 
> > v2: Consensus calls for an unconditional might_sleep (Chris,
> > Christian)
> > 
> > Full audit:
> > - dma-fence.h: Uses MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMOUT, good chance this sleeps
> > - dma-resv.c: Timeout always at least 1
> > - st-dma-fence.c: Save to sleep in testcases
> > - amdgpu_cs.c: Both callers are for variants of the wait ioctl
> > - amdgpu_device.c: Two callers in vram recover code, both right next
> >    to mutex_lock.
> > - amdgpu_vm.c: Use in the vm_wait ioctl, next to _reserve/unreserve
> > - remaining functions in amdgpu: All for test_ib implementations for
> >    various engines, caller for that looks all safe (debugfs, driver
> >    load, reset)
> > - etnaviv: another wait ioctl
> > - habanalabs: another wait ioctl
> > - nouveau_fence.c: hardcoded 15*HZ ... glorious
> > - nouveau_gem.c: hardcoded 2*HZ ... so not even super consistent, but
> >    this one does have a WARN_ON :-/ At least this one is only a
> >    fallback path for when kmalloc fails. Maybe this should be put onto
> >    some worker list instead, instead of a work per unamp ...
> > - i915/selftests: Hardecoded HZ / 4 or HZ / 8
> > - i915/gt/selftests: Going up the callchain looks safe looking at
> >    nearby callers
> > - i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c. Wrapped in a mutex_lock
> > - i915/gem_i915_gem_wait.c: The i915-version which is called instead
> >    for i915 fences already has a might_sleep() annotation, so all good
> > 
> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> > Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "VMware Graphics" <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com>
> > Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
> > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
> > Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

intel-gfx-ci approves too, thanks to both of you for reviews, patch merged
to drm-misc-next.
-Daniel

> 
> > ---
> >   drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > index 90edf2b281b0..656e9ac2d028 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > @@ -208,6 +208,8 @@ dma_fence_wait_timeout(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr, signed long timeout)
> >   	if (WARN_ON(timeout < 0))
> >   		return -EINVAL;
> > +	might_sleep();
> > +
> >   	trace_dma_fence_wait_start(fence);
> >   	if (fence->ops->wait)
> >   		ret = fence->ops->wait(fence, intr, timeout);
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch