From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Vishal Sagar <vsagar@xilinx.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Hyun Kwon <hyunk@xilinx.com>,
"hverkuil@xs4all.nl" <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
"mchehab@kernel.org" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>,
"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"joe@perches.com" <joe@perches.com>,
Sandip Kothari <sandipk@xilinx.com>,
Dinesh Kumar <dineshk@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] media: dt-bindings: media: xilinx: Add Xilinx UHD-SDI Receiver Subsystem
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 04:00:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200824010022.GT6002@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200819164016.GR6049@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Hi Vishal,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 07:40:16PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 01:45:34PM +0000, Vishal Sagar wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 15, 2020 9:59 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:54:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:03:03AM +0530, Vishal Sagar wrote:
> >>>> Add bindings documentation for Xilinx UHD-SDI Receiver Subsystem.
> >>>>
> >>>> The Xilinx UHD-SDI Receiver Subsystem consists of SMPTE UHD-SDI (RX) IP
> >>>> core, an SDI RX to Video Bridge IP core to convert SDI video to native
> >>>> video and a Video In to AXI4-Stream IP core to convert native video to
> >>>> AXI4-Stream.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vishal Sagar <vishal.sagar@xilinx.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> v3
> >>>> - bpc instead of bpp
> >>>> - removed bpc as required property (default to 10 bpc)
> >>>> - add dt-bindings/media/xilinx-sdi.h
> >>>> - made line-rate as u32 instead of string
> >>>> - fixed reg
> >>>> - fixed s/upto/up to/
> >>>>
> >>>> v2
> >>>> - Removed references to xlnx,video*
> >>>> - Fixed as per Sakari Ailus and Rob Herring's comments
> >>>> - Converted to yaml format
> >>>>
> >>>> .../bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,sdirxss.yaml | 132 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> include/dt-bindings/media/xilinx-sdi.h | 20 +++
> >>>> 2 files changed, 152 insertions(+)
> >>>> create mode 100644
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,sdirxss.yaml
> >>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/media/xilinx-sdi.h
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git
> >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,sdirxss.yaml
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,sdirxss.yaml
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 000000000000..6cfc18ca435f
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,sdirxss.yaml
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
> >>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >>>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>>> +---
> >>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/xilinx/xlnx,sdirxss.yaml#
> >>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>>> +
> >>>> +
> >>
> >> I think a single blank line is enough.
> >
> > Ok I will remove extra empty line in next version.
> >
> >>>> +title: Xilinx SMPTE UHD-SDI Receiver Subsystem
> >>>> +
> >>>> +maintainers:
> >>>> + - Vishal Sagar <vishal.sagar@xilinx.com>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +description: |
> >>>> + The SMPTE UHD-SDI Receiver (RX) Subsystem allows you to quickly create systems
> >>>> + based on SMPTE SDI protocols. It receives unaligned native SDI streams from
> >>>> + the SDI GT PHY and outputs an AXI4-Stream video stream, native video, or
> >>>> + native SDI using Xilinx transceivers as the physical layer.
> >>>> +
> >>>> + The subsystem consists of
> >>>> + 1 - SMPTE UHD-SDI Rx
> >>>> + 2 - SDI Rx to Native Video Bridge
> >>>> + 3 - Video In to AXI4-Stream Bridge
> >>>> +
> >>>> + The subsystem can capture SDI streams in up to 12G mode 8 data streams and output
> >>>> + a dual pixel per clock RGB/YUV444,422/420 10/12 bits per component AXI4-Stream.
> >>>> +
> >>>> +properties:
> >>>> + compatible:
> >>>> + items:
> >>>> + - enum:
> >>>> + - xlnx,v-smpte-uhdsdi-rx-ss-2.0
> >>>
> >>> Should be indented 2 more spaces.
> >>
> >> Or you could simply use
> >>
> >> properties:
> >> compatible:
> >> const: xlnx,v-smpte-uhdsdi-rx-ss-2.0
> >
> > Ok I will fix this in the next version.
> >
> >>>> +
> >>>> + reg:
> >>>> + maxItems: 1
> >>>> +
> >>>> + interrupts:
> >>>> + maxItems: 1
> >>>> +
> >>>> + clocks:
> >>>> + description: List of clock specifiers
> >>>
> >>> Drop. That's every 'clocks' property.
> >
> > Ok I will drop the description in next version.
> >
> >>>> + items:
> >>>> + - description: AXI4-Lite clock
> >>>> + - description: SMPTE UHD-SDI Rx core clock
> >>>> + - description: Video clock
> >>>> +
> >>>> + clock-names:
> >>>> + items:
> >>>> + - const: s_axi_aclk
> >>>> + - const: sdi_rx_clk
> >>>> + - const: video_out_clk
> >>>> +
> >>>> + xlnx,bpc:
> >>>> + description: Bits per component supported. Can be 10 or 12 bits per component only.
> >>>> + allOf:
> >>>
> >>> You can drop the 'allOf' now.
> >
> > Ok will update this in next version.
> >
> >>>> + - $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> >>>> + - enum: [10, 12]
> >>>
> >>> Seems like this should be a standard property?
> >>
> >> Rob, if my understanding is correct, this tells for how many bits per
> >> component the IP core has been synthesized. I think it qualifies as a
> >> vendor property, as how to express constraints on supported formats (for
> >> IP cores that can be synthesized with different options) is highly
> >> vendor-specific.
> >
> > Right Laurent. This is specific to Xilinx Video IP cores.
> >
> >> Vishal, I think the question I asked in the review of v2 fell through
> >> the cracks. Is the documentation for the new IP core version available ?
> >> Should this property only be allowed for the new version, given that in
> >> v2.0 the BPC is fixed to 10 ?
> >
> > The new IP core is released with Vivado 2020.1 but the documentation isn't yet
> > publicly updated.
> >
> > This property is optional and the driver defaults to 10bpc in case this property is not specified.
>
> So how about the following ?
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> enum:
> - xlnx,v-smpte-uhdsdi-rx-ss-1.0
> - xlnx,v-smpte-uhdsdi-rx-ss-2.0
>
> ...
>
> xlnx,bpc:
> description: ...
> $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> enum: [10, 12]
> default: 10
>
> ...
>
> allOf:
> - if:
> not:
> properties:
> compatible:
> contains:
> xlnx,v-smpte-uhdsdi-rx-ss-2.0
> then:
> properties:
> xlnx,bpc: false
>
> This indicates that the xlnx,bpc property isn't allowed for v1.0.
> Another option would be
>
> then:
> properties:
> xlnx,bpc:
> const: 10
>
> to indicate it must be equal to 10 on v1.0.
Following our offline discussion, I've revisited this review. It turns
out I have confused IP core versions. The version that only supports 10
bpc is v2.0, while I assume that the version that will support both 10
and 12 bpc will be v3.
Would the following make sense ?
properties:
compatible:
enum:
- xlnx,v-smpte-uhdsdi-rx-ss-2.0
- xlnx,v-smpte-uhdsdi-rx-ss-3.0
...
xlnx,bpc:
description: ...
$ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
enum: [10, 12]
default: 10
...
allOf:
- if:
not:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
xlnx,v-smpte-uhdsdi-rx-ss-3.0
then:
properties:
xlnx,bpc: false
Or, as proposed above,
then:
properties:
xlnx,bpc:
const: 10
> >>>> +
> >>>> + xlnx,line-rate:
> >>>> + description: |
> >>>> + The maximum mode supported by the design. Possible values are as below
> >>>> + 0 - XSDI_STD_3G - 3G mode
> >>>> + 1 - XSDI_STD_6G - 6G mode
> >>>> + 2 - XSDI_STD_12G_8DS - 12G mode with 8 data streams
> >>>> + allOf:
> >>>> + - $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> >>>> + - enum: [0, 1, 2]
> >>>
> >>> Standard?
> >>
> >> For this one, I'm not sure. There's little support for SDI in the
> >> kernel, and I'm sure we'll get this wrong the first time. I'd rather try
> >> not to over-standardize properties before we have more examples.
> >
> > Right. These are specific to Xilinx SDI Rx IP configuration.
>
> I'm not sure it's Xilinx-specific, but I think we don't have enough
> examples of other SDI receivers to know if the propery could be made
> generic or not.
>
> >>>> +
> >>>> + xlnx,include-edh:
> >>>> + type: boolean
> >>>> + description: |
> >>>> + This is present when the Error Detection and Handling processor is
> >>>> + enabled in design.
> >>>> +
> >>>> + ports:
> >>>> + type: object
> >>>> + description: |
> >>>> + Generally the SDI port is connected to a device like SDI Broadcast camera
> >>>> + which is independently controlled. Hence port@0 is a source port which can be
> >>>> + connected to downstream IP which can work with AXI4 Stream data.
> >>>> + properties:
> >>>> + port@0:
> >>>> + type: object
> >>>> + description: Source port
> >>>> + properties:
> >>>> + reg:
> >>>> + const: 0
> >>>> + endpoint:
> >>>> + type: object
> >>>> + properties:
> >>>> + remote-endpoint: true
> >>>> + required:
> >>>> + - remote-endpoint
> >>>> + additionalProperties: false
> >>>> + additionalProperties: false
> >>
> >> Same here, I explained in the review of v2 that we should have an input
> >> port.
> >
> > I will add the input / sink port to this device tree node.
> >
> >>>> +
> >>>> +required:
> >>>> + - compatible
> >>>> + - reg
> >>>> + - interrupts
> >>>> + - clocks
> >>>> + - clock-names
> >>>> + - xlnx,line-rate
> >>>> + - ports
> >>>> +
> >>>> +additionalProperties: false
> >>>> +
> >>>> +examples:
> >>>> + - |
> >>>> + #include <dt-bindings/media/xilinx-sdi.h>
> >>>> + uhdsdirxss: v-smpte-uhdsdi-rxss@80000000 {
> >>
> >> The label is not used, you can drop it.
> >
> > Ok. I will remove this in the next version.
> >
> >>>> + compatible = "xlnx,v-smpte-uhdsdi-rx-ss-2.0";
> >>>> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> >>>> + interrupts = <0 89 4>;
> >>>> + reg = <0x80000000 0x10000>;
> >>>> + xlnx,include-edh;
> >>>> + xlnx,line-rate = <XSDI_STD_12G_8DS>;
> >>>> + clocks = <&clk_1>, <&si570_1>, <&clk_2>;
> >>>> + clock-names = "s_axi_aclk", "sdi_rx_clk", "video_out_clk";
> >>>> + xlnx,bpc = <10>;
> >>
> >> I would group the xlnx,* properties after the standard properties.
> >
> > Noted. Will update in next version.
> >
> >>>> +
> >>>> + ports {
> >>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >>>> + port@0 {
> >>>> + reg = <0>;
> >>>> + sdirx_out: endpoint {
> >>>> + remote-endpoint = <&vcap_sdirx_in>;
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> +...
> >>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/media/xilinx-sdi.h b/include/dt-bindings/media/xilinx-sdi.h
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 000000000000..11938fade041
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/media/xilinx-sdi.h
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >>>> +/*
> >>>> + * Xilinx SDI device tree bindings
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Xilinx, Inc.
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * Contacts: Vishal Sagar <vishal.sagar@xilinx.com>
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_MEDIA_XILINX_SDI_H__
> >>>> +#define __DT_BINDINGS_MEDIA_XILINX_SDI_H__
> >>>> +
> >>>> +/*
> >>>> + * SDI Configurations
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +#define XSDI_STD_3G 0
> >>>> +#define XSDI_STD_6G 1
> >>>> +#define XSDI_STD_12G_8DS 2
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#endif /* __DT_BINDINGS_MEDIA_XILINX_SDI_H__ */
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-24 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 5:33 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add support for Xilinx UHD-SDI Receiver subsystem Vishal Sagar
2020-06-18 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] v4l2-dv-timings: Add timings for 1920x1080P48 and 4KP48 Vishal Sagar
2020-07-15 16:16 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-06-18 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] media: dt-bindings: media: xilinx: Add Xilinx UHD-SDI Receiver Subsystem Vishal Sagar
2020-07-13 18:54 ` Rob Herring
2020-07-15 16:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-08-19 13:45 ` Vishal Sagar
2020-08-19 16:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-08-24 1:00 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-06-18 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] media: v4l: xilinx: Add Xilinx UHD-SDI Rx Subsystem driver Vishal Sagar
2020-06-18 6:53 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-18 8:13 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-25 9:43 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-07-15 21:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-08-19 13:47 ` Vishal Sagar
2020-08-19 16:56 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-08-26 14:10 ` Nicolas Dufresne
2020-08-26 14:50 ` Vishal Sagar
2020-09-10 10:22 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-09-15 2:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-09-15 8:31 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-08-19 13:47 ` Vishal Sagar
2020-07-15 22:42 ` Hyun Kwon
2020-08-19 13:48 ` Vishal Sagar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200824010022.GT6002@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dineshk@xilinx.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=hyunk@xilinx.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=michals@xilinx.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sandipk@xilinx.com \
--cc=vsagar@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).