From: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Issue with cec_register_adapter calling request_module() from an async context when called from intel_dp_detect
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:52:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210218085214.GA9864@gofer.mess.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <876e34f6-c39b-8e97-7ebb-79ae2c356e53@xs4all.nl>
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 05:29:46PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 17/02/2021 16:11, Sean Young wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 04:04:11PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> On 2/17/21 3:32 PM, Sean Young wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:41:46PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>>> Hi Hans,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 17/02/2021 13:24, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>>>> <resend with the linux-media list added to the Cc>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Hans,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fedora has a (opt-in) system to automatically collect backtraces from software
> >>>>> crashing on users systems.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This includes collecting kernel backtraces (including once triggered by
> >>>>> WARN macros) while looking a the top 10 of the most reported backtrace during the
> >>>>> last 2 weeks report from ABRT: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I noticed the following backtrace:
> >>>>> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/8150/
> >>>>> which has been reported 170000 times by Fedora users who have opted-in during the
> >>>>> last 14 days.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The issue here is that cec_register_adapter ends up calling request_module()
> >>>>> from an async context, triggering this warn in kernel/kmod.c __request_module():
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /*
> >>>>> * We don't allow synchronous module loading from async. Module
> >>>>> * init may invoke async_synchronize_full() which will end up
> >>>>> * waiting for this task which already is waiting for the module
> >>>>> * loading to complete, leading to a deadlock.
> >>>>> */
> >>>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(wait && current_is_async());
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The call-path leading to this goes like this:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ? kvasprintf+0x6d/0xa0
> >>>>> ? kobject_set_name_vargs+0x6f/0x90
> >>>>> rc_map_get+0x30/0x60
> >>>>
> >>>> It's not CEC, it is rc_map_get that calls request_module() for rc-cec.ko.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've added Sean Young to the CC list.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sean, is it possible to treat rc-cec as a built-in if MEDIA_CEC_RC is set?
> >>>>
> >>>> I think this issue is very specific to CEC. I would not expect to see this
> >>>> with any other rc keymap.
> >>>
> >>> So CEC creates an RC device with a keymap (cec keymap, of course) and then
> >>> the keymap needs to be loaded. We certainly don't want all keymaps as
> >>> builtins, that would be a waste.
> >>>
> >>> The cec keymap is scanned once to build a map from cec codes to linux
> >>> keycodes; making it builtin is not ideal, and makes the build system a
> >>> bit messy.
> >>>
> >>> I don't think we can load the keymap later, user space may start remapping
> >>> the keymap from udev.
> >>>
> >>> Possibly we could create the cec or rc device later but this could be a bit
> >>> messy.
> >>>
> >>> Could CEC specify:
> >>>
> >>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEDIA_CEC_RC)
> >>> MODULE_SOFTDEP("rc-cec")
> >>> #endif
> >>
> >> That would need to be:
> >>
> >> MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: rc-cec")
> >>
> >> I see that the drm_kms_helper and i915 drivers both depend on the cec module already,
> >> so yes if that module will request for rc-cec to be loaded before it is loaded
> >> (and thus before i915 is loaded) then that should work around this.
> >>
> >> Assuming the user is using a module-loader which honors the softdep...
> >>
> >> Also this assumes that rc_map_get is smart enough to not call request_module()
> >> if the module is already loaded, is that the case ?
> >
> > Yes, see rc_map_get().
>
> I tried this. It works if CONFIG_RC_CORE is set to m, but setting it to
> y resulted in the same problem. It looks like MODULE_SOFTDEP only works if rc_main
> is a module as well.
Hmm, I'm not quite sure what is happening here. How can I reproduce this
issue locally?
Sean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-17 12:24 Issue with cec_register_adapter calling request_module() from an async context when called from intel_dp_detect Hans de Goede
2021-02-17 12:41 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-17 14:32 ` Sean Young
2021-02-17 15:04 ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-17 15:11 ` Sean Young
2021-02-17 16:29 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-18 8:52 ` Sean Young [this message]
2021-02-18 8:59 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-18 15:33 ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-18 16:38 ` Sean Young
2021-02-18 18:37 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210218085214.GA9864@gofer.mess.org \
--to=sean@mess.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox