From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21536C433B4 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74DB61264 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230487AbhEHLda (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2021 07:33:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49632 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230234AbhEHLd3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2021 07:33:29 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC17C061574; Sat, 8 May 2021 04:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id x2so16447496lff.10; Sat, 08 May 2021 04:32:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PXAa7ncW6tnQNSCVmINwjOAXmzqHMKlEEaaWFcl+Zig=; b=sPUbSjRETuhU1bfQmElfOC8xI1jqxOeo727f0En4w3gRQCDqhkU0fR2gOC7DAu+5DV w0ZQWlSEH6VTyTQx2zWBMlxoBcGVRawJuZd5DP6Lk7h4wLHN3bZ2nPJNaBz1IidvbxnG DesFThsHa7xq2omfQaJh43yu9DRxjsBKttN4QhKDw9IC5x3xC2ngffQGj2ZJQ7driXKM aNR1fCZZcxPG8bod4Zraf7Jh83oXbG7hf3Hus99ggnxoIpSvGW7K1OuMCa54sSDCipwc ULhsDzXM4xYh/7crNbBImG4dDYscEphdJHP6vzpjq6be0aWuQ2j1cH05dqQeDM/XLNTB 4BQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PXAa7ncW6tnQNSCVmINwjOAXmzqHMKlEEaaWFcl+Zig=; b=TDH6xs+/Aqj2Gj/enV4znajSVoZNoiO/eA+Eig2+3RNVIY1L5DIQv1gjX27SFNtwAS wYp7KKrzkqsQfmdX04AEIJzpXfj3QJb6hASz1yB6g/4ZhLTdmHQTZI7g/9ou2oPcLKZr quEqUDmOoqyNpiwLFizyCwiGW//GWgkMLstsWrQjqNmdrDcX2n4urbZjZnp0BGq4NUDO WVt+7LE5nAuKcnOWKXdFaU0Mmqg2nbRRL13a0eL4OGi5GOY876o4NxOogoypm1+FK/iO IGigADHXcEE+Xef5LnESt4ygtFBCFyUgtZx7WPLvXhtpDpFgmVdmALhn64mlhmDrPiGp w/HA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+Yj1oNnXt0q+zhEkwrR/d6fK3Ysy+lUBHeOnp32MSGU3bIbvZ b8yRLLmvMTs5MU3vWqxRyjk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEgioyenwxZoCGG+r6LrzxG1yPLmEV5JjlAUjlK+TN8vTgsFK6s5swlQsTZyMzZ5/uclhsHw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e12:: with SMTP id i18mr10122lfv.154.1620473545722; Sat, 08 May 2021 04:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([185.215.60.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s4sm2278568ljp.114.2021.05.08.04.32.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 08 May 2021 04:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 14:32:20 +0300 From: Pavel Skripkin To: Greg KH Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: media: atomisp: code cleanup Message-ID: <20210508143220.0b92bc37@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20210507075458.GB3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> <20210508105129.2698-1-paskripkin@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8git77 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Hi, Greg! On Sat, 8 May 2021 12:58:06 +0200 Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 01:51:29PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > > Breaks are not useful after a return, they can > > simply be removed. > > > > Also, dropped the individual return statements > > after or inside switch cases > > Almost always, when you say "also" in a patch changelog, that means > this should be split up into two different patches. > I thought, I could add this to current patch, because It was suggested by maintainer, but, I guess, I was wrong :) > I recommend doing that here as well, this should be a 2 patch series, > right? > Thanks for suggestion! I will also remove returns at the end of void functions as 3rd patch in serie. > thanks, > > greg k-h With regards, Pavel Skripkin