From: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
To: "Maíra Canal" <maira.canal@usp.br>
Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, lee.jones@linaro.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: rc: pwm-ir-tx: Switch to atomic PWM API
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 08:25:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211024072525.GA31903@gofer.mess.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YXRSaMb2FV78+1tc@fedora>
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 03:20:42PM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Remove legacy PWM interface (pwm_config, pwm_enable, pwm_disable) and
> replace it for the atomic PWM API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
> ---
> V1 -> V2: Assign variables directly and simplify conditional statement
> ---
> drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> index 4bc28d2c9cc9..ca943f168855 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> @@ -53,22 +53,21 @@ static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
> {
> struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir = dev->priv;
> struct pwm_device *pwm = pwm_ir->pwm;
> - int i, duty, period;
> + struct pwm_state state;
> + int i;
> ktime_t edge;
> long delta;
>
> - period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, pwm_ir->carrier);
> - duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(pwm_ir->duty_cycle * period, 100);
> + pwm_init_state(pwm, &state);
>
> - pwm_config(pwm, duty, period);
> + state.period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, pwm_ir->carrier);
> + state.duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(pwm_ir->duty_cycle * period, 100);
That doesn't compile.
Sean
>
> edge = ktime_get();
>
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> - if (i % 2) // space
> - pwm_disable(pwm);
> - else
> - pwm_enable(pwm);
> + state.enabled = !(i % 2);
> + pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
>
> edge = ktime_add_us(edge, txbuf[i]);
> delta = ktime_us_delta(edge, ktime_get());
> @@ -76,7 +75,8 @@ static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
> usleep_range(delta, delta + 10);
> }
>
> - pwm_disable(pwm);
> + state.enabled = false;
> + pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
>
> return count;
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-24 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-23 18:20 [PATCH v2] media: rc: pwm-ir-tx: Switch to atomic PWM API Maíra Canal
2021-10-24 7:25 ` Sean Young [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211024072525.GA31903@gofer.mess.org \
--to=sean@mess.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maira.canal@usp.br \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox