[PATCH 01/26] drm/amdgpu: partially revert "svm bo enable_signal call condition"

["Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>]

Partially revert commit 5f319c5c21b5909abb43d8aadc92a8aa549ee443.

First of all this is illegal use of RCU to call dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling()
since we don't hold a reference to the fence in question and can crash badly.

Then the code doesn't seem to have the intended effect since only the
exclusive fence is handled, but the KFD fences are always added as shared fence.

Only keep the handling to throw away the content of SVM BOs.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
index eab4380f28e5..c15687ce67c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
@@ -116,17 +116,8 @@ static void amdgpu_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
 
 	abo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(bo);
 	if (abo->flags & AMDGPU_AMDKFD_CREATE_SVM_BO) {
-		struct dma_fence *fence;
-		struct dma_resv *resv = &bo->base._resv;
-
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		fence = rcu_dereference(resv->fence_excl);
-		if (fence && !fence->ops->signaled)
-			dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(fence);
-
 		placement->num_placement = 0;
 		placement->num_busy_placement = 0;
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
2.25.1