From: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: "Luben Tuikov" <luben.tuikov@amd.com>,
"Rob Clark" <robdclark@chromium.org>,
"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"open list:SYNC FILE FRAMEWORK" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/14] dma-buf/sync_file: Support (E)POLLPRI
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 11:26:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230224112630.313d7b76@eldfell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGuE89kuKTjjzwW1xMppcVw-M4-hcrtifed-mvsCA=cshQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2064 bytes --]
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:51:48 -0800
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1:38 AM Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:37:26 -0800
> > Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 1:49 AM Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> > > > On another matter, if the application uses SET_DEADLINE with one
> > > > timestamp, and the compositor uses SET_DEADLINE on the same thing with
> > > > another timestamp, what should happen?
> > >
> > > The expectation is that many deadline hints can be set on a fence.
> > > The fence signaller should track the soonest deadline.
> >
> > You need to document that as UAPI, since it is observable to userspace.
> > It would be bad if drivers or subsystems would differ in behaviour.
> >
>
> It is in the end a hint. It is about giving the driver more
> information so that it can make better choices. But the driver is
> even free to ignore it. So maybe "expectation" is too strong of a
> word. Rather, any other behavior doesn't really make sense. But it
> could end up being dictated by how the hw and/or fw works.
It will stop being a hint once it has been implemented and used in the
wild long enough. The kernel userspace regression rules make sure of
that.
See the topic of implementing triple-buffering in Mutter in order to
put more work to the GPU in order to have the GPU ramp up clocks in
order to not miss rendering deadlines. I don't think that patch set has
landed in Mutter upstream, but I hear distributions in downstream are
already carrying it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1383
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1441
Granted, GPU clocks are just one side of that story it seems, and
triple-buffering may have other benefits.
If SET_DEADLINE would fix that problem without triple-buffering, it is
definitely userspace observable, expected and eventually required
behaviour.
Thanks,
pq
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-24 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-18 21:15 [PATCH v4 00/14] dma-fence: Deadline awareness Rob Clark
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] dma-buf/dma-fence: Add deadline awareness Rob Clark
2023-02-22 10:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-02-22 15:28 ` Christian König
2023-02-22 17:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-02-22 17:16 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-22 17:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-02-22 18:57 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-22 11:01 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] dma-buf/fence-array: Add fence deadline support Rob Clark
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] dma-buf/fence-chain: " Rob Clark
2023-02-22 10:27 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-02-22 15:55 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] dma-buf/dma-resv: Add a way to set fence deadline Rob Clark
2023-02-20 8:16 ` Christian König
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] dma-buf/sync_file: Add SET_DEADLINE ioctl Rob Clark
2023-02-20 8:27 ` Christian König
2023-02-20 16:09 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-21 8:41 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-23 9:19 ` Christian König
2023-02-20 8:48 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] dma-buf/sync_file: Support (E)POLLPRI Rob Clark
2023-02-20 8:31 ` Christian König
2023-02-21 8:38 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-20 8:53 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-20 16:14 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-21 8:37 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-21 16:01 ` Sebastian Wick
2023-02-21 17:55 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-21 16:48 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-02-21 17:53 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-22 9:49 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-22 10:26 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-02-22 15:37 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-23 9:38 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-23 18:51 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-24 9:26 ` Pekka Paalanen [this message]
2023-02-24 9:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-02-24 10:24 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-24 10:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-02-24 11:00 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-24 11:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-02-24 15:26 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-02-24 17:59 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-27 21:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-27 22:20 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-27 22:44 ` Sebastian Wick
2023-02-27 23:48 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-28 14:30 ` Sebastian Wick
2023-02-28 22:52 ` Rob Clark
2023-03-01 15:31 ` Sebastian Wick
2023-03-01 16:02 ` Rob Clark
2023-03-01 15:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-24 16:59 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-24 19:44 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-27 9:34 ` Pekka Paalanen
2023-02-27 18:43 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] dma-buf/sw_sync: Add fence deadline support Rob Clark
2023-02-20 8:29 ` Christian König
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] drm/scheduler: " Rob Clark
2023-02-21 19:40 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] drm/msm: Add deadline based boost support Rob Clark
2023-02-18 21:15 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] drm/i915: " Rob Clark
2023-02-20 15:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230224112630.313d7b76@eldfell \
--to=ppaalanen@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=michel@daenzer.net \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox