Re: [PATCH 000/117] media: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hi Uwe,

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 08:02:03AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Mauro
> 
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 04:30:25PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > this series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/pci to use the
> 
> copy&paste failure here: s/pci/media/ of course.
> 
> > .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove() callback
> > .remove_new() returns no value. This is a good thing because the driver core
> > doesn't (and cannot) cope for errors during remove. The only effect of a
> > non-zero return value in .remove() is that the driver core emits a warning. The
> > device is removed anyhow and an early return from .remove() usually yields a
> > resource leak.
> > 
> > By changing the remove callback to return void driver authors cannot
> > reasonably assume any more that there is some kind of cleanup later.
> > 
> > Only three drivers needed some preparation first to make sure they
> > return 0 unconditionally in their remove callback. Then all drivers
> > could be trivially converted without side effects to .remove_new().
> > 
> > The changes to the individual drivers are all orthogonal. If I need to
> > resend some patches because of some review feedback, I'd like to only
> > send the patches that actually needed changes, so please pick up the
> > remaining patches that don't need changing to reduce the amount of mail.
> 
> I didn't hear anything back about application of this series. Is there a
> blocker somewhere?

I think the series got applied to the master branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git.
It should thus appear in v6.4.

The corresponding series for staging media drivers has also been applied
to the same branch as far as I can tell.

> Apart from the three preparatory patches that are a precondition to the
> conversion of the respective drivers, the patches are all pairwise
> orthogonal. So from my POV the best would be to apply all patches that
> still apply (which might be all), I will care for the fallout later
> then.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart